Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on December 18, 2007
Behavioral Ecology 2008 19(2):325-330; doi:10.1093/beheco/arm135
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/2/325    most recent
arm135v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mäntylä, E.
Right arrow Articles by Laaksonen, T.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mäntylä, E.
Right arrow Articles by Laaksonen, T.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Low light reflectance may explain the attraction of birds to defoliated trees

Elina Mäntylä, Tero Klemola, Päivi Sirkiä and Toni Laaksonen

Section of Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turku, Finland

Address correspondence to E. Mäntylä. E-mail: elkuma{at}utu.fi.


   Abstract

Plants use volatile organic compounds to attract invertebrate predators and parasitoids of their herbivore pests. Recently, it has been suggested that plants, either through visual or olfactory cues, may also "cry for help" from vertebrate predators such as birds. We show that in a laboratory choice test, passerine birds (Parus major and Cyanistes caeruleus) were attracted to the intact branches of trees (Betula pendula) suffering from foliar damage caused by herbivore larvae (Epirrita autumnata) in nontest branches. Species, age, or sex of the experimental bird or lighting (ultraviolet [UV] or non-UV) did not affect the preference. However, the birds made a clear choice between the treatments when the trees came from a forest patch receiving more sunlight, whereas no obvious choice was observed when the trees came from a shadier forest patch. Results of the choice test were supported by the spectral reflectance of tree leaves. In the sunnier forest patch, control trees reflected more visible light than the herbivore trees, whereas no such difference was found in the shadier forest patch trees. We suggest that avian predators use their vision within visible wavelengths to find insect-rich plants even when they do not see the prey items or damaged leaves.

Key words: induced plant defenses, insect herbivory, tritrophic interactions, vertebrate predators, vision.

Received 23 March 2007; revised 26 September 2007; accepted 13 November 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.