Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on January 10, 2008
Behavioral Ecology 2008 19(2):369-373; doi:10.1093/beheco/arm142
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/2/369    most recent
arm142v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tanner, M.
Right arrow Articles by Richner, H.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tanner, M.
Right arrow Articles by Richner, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Ultraviolet reflectance of plumage for parent–offspring communication in the great tit (Parus major)

Marion Tanner and Heinz Richner

Zoological Institute, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 6, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland

Address correspondence to M. Tanner. E-mail: marion.tanner{at}esh.unibe.ch.


  Abstract

Ultraviolet (UV) reflectance has been implicated in mate selection. Yet, in some bird species the plumage of young varies in UV reflectance already in the nest and long before mate choice and sexual selection come into play. Most birds molt the juvenile body plumage before reaching sexual maturity, and thus, some conspicuous traits of the juvenile body plumage may rather have evolved by natural selection, possibly via predation or parental preference. This second hypothesis is largely untested and predicts a differential allocation of food between fledging and total independence, which is a time period of 2–3 weeks where offspring mortality is also highest. Here, we test the prediction that parents use the individual variation in UV reflectance among fledglings for differential food allocation. We manipulated UV reflectance of the plumage of fledgling great tits Parus major by treating chest and cheek feathers with a lotion that either did or did not contain UV blockers and then recorded food allocation by parents in an outdoor design simulating postfledging conditions. The visible spectrum was minimally affected by this treatment. Females were found to feed UV-reflecting offspring preferentially, whereas males had no preference. It is the first evidence showing that the UV reflectance of the feathers of young birds has a signaling function in parent–offspring communication and suggests that the UV traits evolved via parental preference.

Key words: great tit, parental care, parent–offspring communication, signal, ultraviolet reflectance.

Received 27 April 2007; revised 21 November 2007; accepted 21 November 2007.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.