Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on August 4, 2008
Behavioral Ecology 2008 19(6):1200-1207; doi:10.1093/beheco/arn086
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/6/1200    most recent
arn086v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Szulkin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sheldon, B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Szulkin, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sheldon, B. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Correlates of the occurrence of inbreeding in a wild bird population

Marta Szulkin and Ben C. Sheldon

Department of Zoology, Edward Grey Institute, University of Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK

Address correspondence to M. Szulkin. E-mail: marta.szulkin{at}zoo.ox.ac.uk.


   Abstract

Inbreeding occurs when close relatives mate. In most populations, inbreeding is uncommon, with the result that we know little about the characteristics of those individuals that inbreed. However, such information may be invaluable for understanding the causes of inbreeding and inbreeding avoidance and the consequences of inbreeding. We investigated the characteristics of closely inbreeding individuals using 43 years of data from a wild great tit (Parus major) population in order to 1) characterize close inbreeding in terms of the family relationships involved; 2) compare inbreeding with noninbreeding individuals; and 3) determine whether close inbreeding was subsequently avoided by those that experience it. We found an uneven distribution of different types of close inbreeding, with sib mating most frequent and father–daughter matings least frequent. We did not find any evidence for clear predictors of inbreeding. By comparing the reproductive success of individuals that both inbred and outbred in their lifetimes, we demonstrate that inbreeding depression is solely attributable to the mixing of relatives’ genes and is thus independent of any tendency for low-quality parental genotypes or phenotypes to inbreed. Surprisingly, mating with close kin reduced the probability of divorce in the following reproductive season, while brood or fledging failure did not predict for remating. Overall, our results suggest that inbreeding is not a response to lowered prospects and that despite the substantial fitness cost of inbreeding, its avoidance in this population may be based on general mechanisms such as dispersal rather than specific kin avoidance.

Key words: divorce, great tit, inbreeding, inbreeding depression, parental quality, Parus major, pedigree, remating, Wytham.

Received 12 November 2007; revised 16 June 2008; accepted 19 June 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.