Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on July 30, 2008
Behavioral Ecology 2008 19(6):1361-1368; doi:10.1093/beheco/arn096
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/6/1361    most recent
arn096v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beauchamp, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Beauchamp, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Review

What is the magnitude of the group-size effect on vigilance?

Guy Beauchamp

Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Montréal, PO Box 5000, St-Hyacinthe, Québec J2S 7C6, Canada

Address correspondence to G. Beauchamp. E-mail: guy.beauchamp{at}umontreal.ca.


   Abstract

Vigilance has been predicted to decrease with group size due to increased predator detection and dilution of predation risk in larger groups. Although earlier literature reviews have provided ample support for this prediction, an increasing number of studies have failed to document a decline in vigilance with group size. In addition, support for this prediction has been based thus far on the P value of the relationship between vigilance and group size rather than on a quantitative assessment of effect magnitude. Here, I use a meta-analysis of empirical relationships between vigilance and group size in birds published in the last 35 years to provide a reassessment of the group-size effect on vigilance. Nearly one-third of all published relationships between vigilance and group size were not significant (n = 172). Results from the meta-analysis indicate weak to moderate negative correlations between group size and time spent vigilant (n = 43), scan frequency (n = 29), or scan duration (n = 20). The magnitude of the relationship was stronger in studies that controlled the amount of food available to birds. A funnel plot of the relationship between correlation coefficients and sample size failed to reveal an obvious publication bias. Although the meta-analysis results generally support the prediction that vigilance should decline with group size, a large amount of variation in vigilance remains unexplained in avian studies.

Key words: birds, group size, meta-analysis, vigilance.

Received 31 March 2008; revised 27 June 2008; accepted 3 July 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.