Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lyon, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Eadie, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lyon, B. E.
Right arrow Articles by Eadie, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1991 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Mode of development and interspecific avian brood parasitism

Bruce E. Lyon and John M. Eadie

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544-1003, USA Division of Life Sciences and Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Scarborough Campus, Scarborough, Ontario, MIC 1A4, Canada

ABSTRACT

Avian interspecific brood parasites differ considerably in their commitment to parasitism; 87 species are obligate brood parasites, whereas 35 species are known to be facultative brood parasites. This variation is strongly related to mode of development. Obligate parasitism is found almost exclusively in altricial species, whereas facultative interspecific parasitism is predominant in precocial birds. We propose that the association between mode of development and form of parasitism reflects a fundamental difference between altricial and precocial birds in the relative benefits of emancipation from parental care after laying. We argue that altricial brood parasites obtain such a large increase in realized fecundity by avoiding the costs of parental care that obligate parasitism is favored over facultative parasitism. In contrast, precocial brood parasites gain relatively little in terms of increased fecundity via obligate parasitism, and much of this increase could potentially be gained by facultative parasitism. Thus, obligate interspecific brood parasitism will not be favored in precocial birds. Three factors influence this difference between altricial and precocial species: (1) altricial birds have relatively more energy and nutrients with which to lay additional eggs, (2) altricial birds can produce more eggs for the same amount of energy and nutrients, and (3) altricial birds realize a greater relative gain in fecundity for each additional egg laid. We suggest further that facultative interspecific parasitism in birds may originate simply through a carry over of intraspecific parasitism; 29 of 33 facultative interspecific parasites also parasitize conspecifics. Facultative parasitism of other species would provide a greater range of potential host nests and could be maintained as an evolutionarily stable end point by the same mechanisms that maintain intraspecific brood parasitism. [Behav Ecol 1991;2:309–318]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
Y. Yom-Tov and E. Geffen
On the origin of brood parasitism in altricial birds
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2006; 17(2): 196 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
M. Robert and G. Sorci
The evolution of obligate interspecific brood parasitism in birds
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2001; 12(2): 128 - 133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.