Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on September 24, 2008
Behavioral Ecology 2009 20(1):111-116; doi:10.1093/beheco/arn121
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/1/111    most recent
arn121v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mahurin, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Freeberg, T. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mahurin, E. J.
Right arrow Articles by Freeberg, T. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Chick-a-dee call variation in Carolina chickadees and recruiting flockmates to food

Ellen J. Mahurina and Todd M. Freeberga,b

a Department of Psychology b Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA

Address correspondence to T.M. Freeberg, Department of Psychology, 301B Austin Peay Building, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA. E-mail: tfreeber{at}utk.edu.


  Abstract

The "chick-a-dee" call of many Paridae species (titmice, tits, and chickadees) is structurally complex and functions in social cohesion. Studies with different Parid species suggest that variation in the note composition of calls relates to a wide variety of contexts. An earlier study with Carolina chickadees (Poecile carolinensis), the focal species of the present study, found that receivers responded differently to playback calls differing in note composition in feeding contexts. Here, we addressed whether signalers actually produce calls differing in note composition in feeding contexts and whether those calls might serve a recruitment function. In a first study, we found that the first chickadee to take seed from a feeding station produced calls with a greater number of D notes before the second chickadee arrived to take seed, compared with after the second chickadee arrived to take seed. This suggests that calls with a large number of D notes might serve a general recruitment function. We tested this idea in a second study, using playbacks of calls containing a large number of D notes or a small number of D notes at different sites. We found that the latency for a first chickadee to come into a site and take seed was shorter for playback variants containing a large number of D notes. Thus, in Carolina chickadees, chick-a-dee calls containing a large number of D notes may function to recruit other flock members to a discovered food source.

Key words: Carolina chickadee, chick-a-dee calls, foraging, recruitment, vocalizations.

Received 12 June 2008; revised 8 August 2008; accepted 8 August 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.