Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on February 12, 2009
Behavioral Ecology 2009 20(2):296-304; doi:10.1093/beheco/arp007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/2/296    most recent
arp007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bentley, T.
Right arrow Articles by Goubault, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bentley, T.
Right arrow Articles by Goubault, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The elusive paradox: owner–intruder roles, strategies, and outcomes in parasitoid contests

Tom Bentleya, Tristan T. Hulla, Ian C.W. Hardya and Marlène Goubaulta,b

a School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE12 5RD, UK b Institut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l'Insecte, IRBI UMR CNRS 6035, Université François Rabelais, 37200 Tours, France

Address correspondence to I.C.W. Hardy. E-mail: ian.hardy{at}nottingham.ac.uk.


  Abstract

Models of dyadic contests for indivisible resources have predicted that the owner–intruder role distinction can suffice as a cue for evolutionarily stable resolution. This outcome may be "common sense" (prior owners retain the resource) or counterintuitively "paradoxical" (the intruder takes over), but the most recent models predict paradoxes to be an infrequent result, and there are also very few candidate examples provided by empirical study. Possible paradoxical outcomes were recently reported from the parasitoid wasp Goniozus legneri in which adult females compete directly for hosts. Here we provide further investigation, taking into account influences of contest ability (body size) and the value of the host to each contestant (correlated with the developmental stage of the owner's brood). We additionally evaluate contest strategies in terms of respect for ownership as evidenced by attack behavior during contests. Goniozus legneri shows weak, and thus only partial, respect for role asymmetries: such mixed strategies are predicted by recent models that assume population-level feedback on resource value parameters. Contest outcomes are influenced by asymmetries in resource value and body size and are generally common sense. Instances of paradoxical contests remain predictably elusive.

Key words: antibourgeois strategy, Goniozus legneri, maternal investment, paradoxical strategy, partial respect, resource value asymmetry.

Received 21 August 2008; revised 3 December 2008; accepted 9 December 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.