Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on January 30, 2009
Behavioral Ecology 2009 20(2):335-339; doi:10.1093/beheco/arp002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/2/335    most recent
arp002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hjernquist, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gustafsson, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hjernquist, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Gustafsson, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Sex allocation in response to local resource competition over breeding territories

Mårten B. Hjernquista, Katherine A. Thuman Hjernquista, Jukka T. Forsmana,b and Lars Gustafssona

a Animal Ecology/Department of Ecology and Evolution, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, SE75236 Uppsala, Sweden b Department of Biology, University of Oulu, PO Box 3000, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland

Address correspondence to M.B. Hjernquist. E-mail: marten.hjernquist{at}ebc.uu.se.


   Abstract

Sex allocation according to local resource competition suggests that investment and offspring sex ratio should be biased toward the dispersing sex to limit the competition among the natal philopatric sex. Conversely, when competition over resources is low, parents should allocate more resources toward the philopatric sex. In this study, this reciprocal scenario of sex allocation is tested. More specifically, the effect of breeding territory availability on primary sex ratio is studied in the collared flycatcher, a migratory passerine bird, where males are the natal philopatric sex. As predicted, primary sex ratios were biased toward males in areas where available territories were abundant (estimated from population growth). No relationship between sex ratio adjustment and adult phenotypes as well as date of first egg was found. We discuss potential explanation for the male-biased broods in areas with many vacant territories and low levels of competition. We suggest that sex ratio adjustment in relation to breeding territory quality and availability could be relatively common in birds.

Key words: collared flycatcher, Ficedula, local resource competition, primary sex ratio, sex allocation, territory availability.

Received 3 August 2008; revised 24 November 2008; accepted 11 December 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.