Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on November 20, 2008
Behavioral Ecology 2009 20(2):433-440; doi:10.1093/beheco/arn142
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/2/433    most recent
arn142v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Møller, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by de Lope, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Møller, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by de Lope, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Individual differences in protandry, sexual selection, and fitness

Anders P. Møllera, Javier Balbontínc, José Javier Cuervob, Ignacio G. Hermosellc and F. de Lopec

a Laboratoire de Parasitologie Evolutive, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Récherche 7103 Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Bât. A, 7ème étage, 7 quai Street, Bernard, Case 237, F-75252 Paris Cedex 05, France b Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas, Consejo Superiór de Investigationes Scientificas, Calle General Segura 1, E-04001 Almería, Spain c Departamento de Biología Animal, Universidad de Extremadura, E-06071 Badajoz, Spain

Address correspondence to A.P. Møller. E-mail: amoller{at}snv.jussieu.fr.


   Abstract

Protandry is the difference in arrival date between males and females, with competition among males for access to preferred territories (the rank advantage hypothesis) or mating success (the mate opportunity hypothesis) supposedly driving the evolution of protandry. The fitness costs and benefits of protandry accruing to individuals differing in degree of protandry (arrival date of a male relative to the arrival date of his partner) have never been quantified. We analyzed the fitness consequences of sex differences in arrival date in the barn swallow Hirundo rustica, in which arrival date can be precisely estimated and the fitness of pairs differing in degree of individual protandry assessed. Early arriving males had greater mating success than late arriving males. The number of extrapair offspring in own nests decreased with increasing degree of individual protandry, whereas the number of offspring fathered by a focal male was unrelated to individual protandry. There was directional selection on individual protandry as shown by pairs with a larger than average degree of protandry reproducing early and, hence, supposedly producing more recruits. There was also stabilizing selection on individual protandry as shown by pairs with an intermediate degree of protandry reproducing early. Annual production of fledglings increased with early arrival of males, but not with early arrival of females, once the effect of laying date had been considered, with no additional effect of individual protandry. Neither male nor female survival was significantly related to degree of individual protandry. These findings are consistent not only with the mate opportunity hypothesis but also with a sexual conflict hypothesis, suggesting that males and females differ in their optimal timing of arrival due to sex-specific fitness costs and benefits.

Key words: barn swallow, extrapair paternity, Hirundo rustica, optimal arrival time, sex ratio.

Received 31 January 2008; revised 18 September 2008; accepted 1 October 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Integr. Comp. Biol.Home page
T. Coppack and F. Pulido
Proximate control and adaptive potential of protandrous migration in birds
Integr. Comp. Biol., November 1, 2009; 49(5): 493 - 506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.