Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on April 8, 2009
Behavioral Ecology 2009 20(3):657-664; doi:10.1093/beheco/arp048
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/3/657    most recent
arp048v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, L. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Examining potential benefits of group living in a sawfly larva, Perga affinis

Lynn E. Fletcher

Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Mudd Hall, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, NY 14853, USA

Address correspondence to L.E. Fletcher. E-mail: lef23{at}cornell.edu.


   Abstract

Although defense may serve as a primary selective force behind the evolution and maintenance of social behavior, numerous other benefits play a role as well. Larvae of the Australian sawfly, Perga affinis, live in colonies and retain their gregarious lifestyle through pupation. To evaluate selective pressures maintaining social behavior in P. affinis, I investigated potential benefits of group living. These included predation protection, immune function, thermoregulation, foraging facilitation, and pupation success where I compared treatments between individuals versus groups and between groups of different sizes. I found no evidence of predation on larvae; however, the mortality risk was significantly higher for single versus grouped larvae, suggesting that other grouping benefits are important. Immune function was not a benefit as hemolymph from single versus grouped larvae did not differ in its ability to limit bacterial growth. Investigating thermoregulation revealed that grouped larvae attained significantly higher temperatures than single individuals and that large groups reached higher temperatures than small groups. Larvae grew significantly faster at higher temperatures, indicating that the increased heat absorption and retention capacity of large groups may speed up development. Group size did not affect foraging facilitation (measured via weight gain) except during the last time period, where individuals in large groups gained significantly more weight. Weight gain in the last instar may be critical for pupation as high larval weight significantly increased the odds of pupation success. Thus, the group size effect on weight gain during the last instar provides an adaptive explanation for the observed ontogenetic increase in colony size and coalescence.

Key words: group living, growth rate, group size, larvae, ontogenic shift, thermoregulation.

Received 7 August 2008; revised 22 February 2009; accepted 24 February 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.