Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on June 22, 2009
Behavioral Ecology 2009 20(4):844-855; doi:10.1093/beheco/arp069
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/4/844    most recent
arp069v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Broom, M.
Right arrow Articles by Borries, C.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Broom, M.
Right arrow Articles by Borries, C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Variation in dominance hierarchies among group-living animals: modeling stability and the likelihood of coalitions

Mark Brooma, Andreas Koenigb and Carola Borriesb

a Department of Mathematics, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9RF, UK b Department of Anthropology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794–4364, USA

Address correspondence to M. Broom. E-mail: m.broom{at}sussex.ac.uk.


  Abstract

Dominance hierarchies based on resource holding potential (RHP) or age are central to the social structure of many group-living animals. Nonhuman primate females and some other mammals are unusual because ranks can depend on kin support or follow an inverse age-graded pattern independent of kin. Whereas the former hierarchies are mediated by frequent coalitions leading to long-term stability, the latter are unstable due to individualistic contests and occasional revolutionary coalitions. We use mathematical modeling to investigate this variation, based on the interaction of triads, subgroups of the group consisting of 3 individuals. This produces 4 key situations, namely that relationships can be either stable or unstable, and involving coalitionary support or not. Varying the parameter values of our model and applying it to real-world examples, we conclude that the emergence of different dominance hierarchies depends on 6 major factors. In addition to RHP, reproductive skew and demography often suggested previously, we stress the importance of 1) the variance in relatedness; 2) the costs and likelihood of interventions; and 3) the value of resources and rank in different life stages, which might be tightly linked to the life history of a species.

Key words: age-inversed hierarchies, ESS, evolutionary games, matrilineal hierarchies, triads.

Received 13 October 2008; revised 25 March 2009; accepted 1 April 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.