Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on August 12, 2009
Behavioral Ecology 2009 20(5):1133-1137; doi:10.1093/beheco/arp107
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/5/1133    most recent
arp107v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saxton, T. K.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, S. C.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Saxton, T. K.
Right arrow Articles by Roberts, S. C.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Trade-offs between markers of absolute and relative quality in human facial preferences

Tamsin K. Saxtona,b, Anthony C. Littlec, Hannah M. Rowlandb, Ting Gaob and S. Craig Robertsb

a School of Psychology, University of St Andrews, St Mary's College, South Street, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9JP, UK b School of Biological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK c Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK

Address correspondence to T.K. Saxton. E-mail: tamsin.saxton{at}st-andrews.ac.uk.


  Abstract

Individuals are attuned to cues of quality in potential mates. Mate quality is assessed on both an absolute scale, independent of the observer, and also on a relative scale, dependent on attributes of the observer. Much research has focused on how individuals respond to either absolute or relative quality in mate choice, but how these dimensions are weighted during mate-choice decisions is poorly understood and has recently attracted much theoretical interest. Here, we examine the interplay between women's facial preferences for a measure of absolute quality (sexual dimorphism) and one of relative quality (self-similarity). Women rated the attractiveness of male faces that had been simultaneously manipulated along the dimensions of masculinity and self-similarity in short-term and long-term relationship contexts. Sexual dimorphism had a greater positive effect on ratings than self-similarity, and masculinity and self-similarity had positive combinative effects on ratings of attractiveness. Women's coexpressed preferences for masculine faces combined with their lesser preference for subtly self-similar faces may reflect selection of good genes, promote optimal outbreeding, and give rise to directional selection, even in the presence of a general self-similarity preference.

Key words: attractiveness, face preference, facial masculinity, genetic compatibility, mate choice, self-similarity.

Received 5 March 2009; revised 3 July 2009; accepted 5 July 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.