Skip Navigation


Behavioral Ecology Advance Access originally published online on June 29, 2009
Behavioral Ecology 2009 20(5):913-921; doi:10.1093/beheco/arp059
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Lay Summary
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/5/913    most recent
arp059v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Farwell, M.
Right arrow Articles by McLaughlin, R. L.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Farwell, M.
Right arrow Articles by McLaughlin, R. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Alternative foraging tactics and risk taking in brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis)

Michelle Farwell and Robert L. McLaughlin

Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1

Address correspondence to M. Farwell, who is now at Department of Biological Sciences, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada N9B 3P4. E-mail: farwellm{at}uwindsor.ca.


   Abstract

Recently emerged brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis) foraging in still-water pools along the sides of streams tend to be sedentary, feeding from the lower portion of the water column (sitting and waiting), or active, feeding from the upper portion of the water column (active search). Individuals exhibiting intermediate behavior are observed less frequently. We assessed the perceptual, energetic, and locomotor bases of the individual differences in foraging tactics by testing whether an individual's activity while searching for prey in the field was linked to its willingness to take risks, resting metabolic rate (RMR), and swimming capacity. Proportion of time an individual spent moving during prey search was quantified in the field, the individual was captured, and willingness to take risks (field), resting oxygen consumption (lab), and locomotor ability (lab) were measured. Individuals that spent a lesser proportion of time moving in the field took longer to exit from a dark tube into an unfamiliar field environment, and delayed their exit times more in response to a novel object, than did individuals that spent a greater proportion of time moving in the field. Proportion of time spent moving in the field was unrelated to resting oxygen consumption and swimming capacity measured in the laboratory. Dispositions in foraging behavior and risk taking early in life could influence encounter rates with novel prey and habitats, which are important steps in the initial stages of resource polymorphisms.

Key words: emergence test, novel object, oxygen consumption, personality, resource polymorphism, swimming performance.

Received 12 May 2008; revised 23 February 2009; accepted 4 March 2009.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.