Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hurst, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Barnard, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hurst, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Barnard, C. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Kinship and social behavior in wild house mice: effects of social group membership and relatedness on the responses of dominant males toward juveniles

Jane L. Hurst and C. J. Barnard

Behaviour and Ecology Research Group, Department of Life Science, University of Nottingham University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK

ABSTRACT

Social and sexual interactions among house mice appear to be influenced by kinship. Although such kinship effects have been interpreted as kin discrimination, they may instead reflect kin bias arising incidentally from discriminating between members of different social groups. We tested the incidental discrimination hypothesis using seminatural groups of wild house mice by looking at the effects of relatedness to other dominant males and relatedness to self on the responses of dominant adult males to juveniles reared within their own or within a neighboring social group. The results suggest that a juvenile's sire and the territorial significance of the sire have an important influence on interactions between dominant males and juveniles from their own or neighboring groups. However, the effects depend on the classes of individual involved and the context in which interactions take place. Sire-related discrimination was apparent only when neighboring groups were allowed to mix and interact. When encountering neighbors, dominant males were most aggressive toward neighbor-group juveniles sired by the neighbor-group dominant male but did not discriminate in favor of their own offspring. Aggression against own-group members was much rarer than against neighbors and appeared to arise by mistake when neighboring groups were mixing. Sire effects among own-group members were due mainly to low numbers of attacks by dominants against their own offspring when intruding in the neighbor-group territory.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
N. Pillay, J. Eborall, and G. Ganem
Divergence of mate recognition in the African striped mouse (Rhabdomys)
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2006; 17(5): 757 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
C. Smadja and G. Ganem
Subspecies recognition in the house mouse: a study of two populations from the border of a hybrid zone
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2002; 13(3): 312 - 320.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.