Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Catterall, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kikkawa, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Catterall, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kikkawa, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Vigilance does not covary with group size in an island population of silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis)

Caria P. Catterall, Mark A. Elgar and Jiro Kikkawa

Division of Environmental Sciences, Griffith University Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia Department of Zoology, University of Queensland St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia

ABSTRACT

Numerous studies on different taxonomic groups have found that vigilance behavior is negatively correlated with group size, as predicted by several theoretical models. This follows the logical argument that each individual in a larger group can spend less time scanning for predators (and more time feeding), while the group as a whole maintains a high probability of detecting an approaching predator. We investigated the relationship between these variables in the population of silvereyes (Zosterops lateralis chlorocephala) on Heron Island, Great Barrier Reef. The study used procedures of field observation that controlled or measured other variables with which vigilance is often correlated: food density and quality, temperature, time of day, distance from cover, habitat obstructions, observer proximity, breeding status, age, sex, and dominance. There was no relationship between scanning behavior and group size under these conditions. There are several possible explanations, related to the silvereyes' biology, for this lack of covariation. An additional explanation is that Heron Island is a predator-free environment for this species, and covariation between group size and vigilance is not expected in the absence of predators.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
E. Fernandez-Juricic, S. Siller, and A. Kacelnik
Flock density, social foraging, and scanning: an experiment with starlings
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2004; 15(3): 371 - 379.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
D. T. Blumstein and J. C. Daniel
Isolation from mammalian predators differentially affects two congeners
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2002; 13(5): 657 - 663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.