Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deutsch, J. C
Right arrow Articles by Weeks, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Deutsch, J. C
Right arrow Articles by Weeks, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Uganda kob prefer high-visibility leks and territories

James C Deutsch and Paul Weeks

Large Animal Research Group, Department of Zoology Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK Uganda Institute of Ecology P.O. Box 3530, Kampala, Uganda

Address reprint requests to J. C Deutsch.

ABSTRACT

In lekking species, where males provide estrous females with little more than sperm, it has been widely supposed that the only possible benefits to females of mate choice are genetic. We studied female choice of leks and territories in a reduncine antelope, the Uganda kob (Kobus kob thomasi), and found that females consistently preferred high-visibility mating sites. Leks were elevated and had shorter grass and fewer thickets than the surrounding areas. Changes in the number of male and female kob on 10 leks were correlated with changes in surrounding grass height, and both females and males preferred leks with experimentally reduced grass height over neighboring controls. Within a lek, territory popularity was the primary determinant of male daily mating success, and females preferred territories relatively far from thickets, but removal of thickets did not affect female territory preferences. Because lion hunting success on kob increases with grass height and thicket density, females may benefit directly from these preferences by reducing the risk of predation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
K. Isvaran and C. M. St. Mary
When should males lek? Insights from a dynamic state variable model
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2003; 14(6): 876 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
R. R. Warner and a. L. M. Dill
Courtship displays and coloration as indicators of safety rather than of male quality : the safety assurance hyposthesis
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2000; 11(4): 444 - 451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
J. Carranza and J. Valencia
Red deer females collect on male clumps at mating areas
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 1999; 10(5): 525 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.