Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clutton-Brock, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by MacColl, A. D. C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Clutton-Brock, T. H.
Right arrow Articles by MacColl, A. D. C
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1992 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Mate retention, harassment, and the evolution of ungulate leks

T. H. Clutton-Brock, O. F. Price and A. D. C MacColl

Large Animal Research Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK

ABSTRACT

Current models of lek breeding mostly suggest that males defend clustered mating territories because females show a preference for mating on leks. Here we argue that, in lek-breeding ungulates, males may also gain benefits from holding clustered mating territories because clusters retain does in estrus. We show that in fallow deer (Dama dama) harems are commonly disrupted by young males. Bucks that hold territories on the lek that lose their harems quickly regain does as other harems are disrupted, whereas bucks defending isolated, single territories rarely regain does the same day. The risk of harassment may also help to explain why does in estrus leave the large, unstable herds that they usually live in. Does in estrus are frequently chased by young males when outside male mating territories. Benefits of moving to the lek (versus moving to single territories) include reduced risks of long chases. Though intrusions by young bucks are the commonest cause of does leaving male territories in our study population, other factors that cause does to move between neighboring harems (including disturbance by predators and persistent courtship by males) may generate benefits to males holding clustered mating territories. Once clustered mating territories have developed, the additional costs of mate choice are likely to be low, and female preferences for particular male characteristics may be likely to develop.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
S. R. Sundaresan, I. R. Fischhoff, and D. Rubenstein
Male harassment influences female movements and associations in Grevy's zebra (Equus grevyi)
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2007; 18(5): 860 - 865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
I. M. Hamilton, M. P. Haesler, and M. Taborsky
Predators, reproductive parasites, and the persistence of poor males on leks
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 97 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
M. Wikelski, S. S. Steiger, B. Gall, and K. N. Nelson
Sex, drugs and mating role: testosterone-induced phenotype-switching in Galapagos marine iguanas
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2005; 16(1): 260 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
K. Isvaran and C. M. St. Mary
When should males lek? Insights from a dynamic state variable model
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2003; 14(6): 876 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
J. Bro-Jorgensen
No peace for estrous topi cows on leks
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2003; 14(4): 521 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Bro-Jorgensen
From the Cover: Overt female mate competition and preference for central males in a lekking antelope
PNAS, July 9, 2002; 99(14): 9290 - 9293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
J. Carranza and J. Valencia
Red deer females collect on male clumps at mating areas
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 1999; 10(5): 525 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
M. H. Cassini
The evolution of reproductive systems in pinnipeds
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 1999; 10(5): 612 - 616.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ScienceHome page
L. Partridge and Laurence D. Hurst
Sex and Conflict
Science, September 25, 1998; 281(5385): 2003 - 2008.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.