© 1993 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
research-article |
Parentage and the evolution of parental behavior
Center for Evolutionary Ecology, T.H. Morgan School of Biological Sciences 101 Morgan Building University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506-0225, USA Section of Neurobiology and Behavior, Seeley Mudd Hall, Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853-2072, USA
Address reprint requests to either author.
ABSTRACT
Parentage is the proportion of juveniles in a brood that are offspring of potential care givers. We analyzed how reductions in parentage affect the evolution of parental behavior using a static optimization model. The main benefit of parental effort was an increase in the survival of offspring, and the main costs were reduced opportunities to seek additional matings or to parasitize neighbors and or reduced survival. Both the costs and benefits included terms for relatedness to young. The effect of parentage depended on (1) whether parents responded in ecological time (facultative response) or in evolutionary time (nonfacultative response), (2) whether the cues enabling assessment of parentage permitted discrimination among offspring, and (3) whether parentage was the same among different groups of juveniles (unrestricted) or varied between them (restricted). When parents did not know their own parentage and mean parentage was the same for all matings, reduced parentage affected the costs and benefits equally, so, as in several previous models, there was no effect on the optimal level of parental effort. Parentage did affect optimal parental effort when mean parentage to the present brood differed from that to young from alternative or future matings. Lowered parentage reduced optimal parental effort when the cost of parenting was missed opportunities for extrapair copulations or brood parasitism or when parentage was consistently higher in alternative or future matings. Nonlinear changes in parentage with age gave complex trajectories of parental care, with individuals of different ages having similar parentage but exhibiting different levels of parental effort. Correlations between parentage and other variables in the model (such as opportunities for additional matings) sometimes masked, but never eliminated, the effects of parentage. When parents could discriminate their own young in a brood, overall parental effort was reduced, but nepotism was increased. When parents could not discriminate their own offspring but had general cues about average parentage to the brood, effects varied depending on the costs and benefits of parental behavior. When parental behavior was costly to care givers, parentage had more effect than when parenting was not costly. Likewise, parentage had less effect when care greatly increased offspring survival than when care was less necessary. Our analyses reconcile conflicting results from previous models and suggest a general framework for analyzing parental behavior within populations and among higher taxonomic groups.
Key words: paternity, maternity, parental investment, uncertain parentage, relatedness, optimization models, extrapair, copulations, intraspecific brood parasitism.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. Dickens and I. R. Hartley Differences in parental food allocation rules: evidence for sexual conflict in the blue tit? Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2007; 18(4): 674 - 679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Kvarnemo Evolution and maintenance of male care: is increased paternity a neglected benefit of care? Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 144 - 148. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
O. Rios-Cardenas and M. S. Webster Paternity and paternal effort in the pumpkinseed sunfish Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2005; 16(5): 914 - 921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. M. Bouwman, C. M. Lessells, and J. Komdeur Male reed buntings do not adjust parental effort in relation to extrapair paternity Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2005; 16(3): 499 - 506. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. D. Neff Increased performance of offspring sired by parasitic males in bluegill sunfish Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2004; 15(2): 327 - 331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. L. Dickinson Male share of provisioning is not influenced by actual or apparent loss of paternity in western bluebirds Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2003; 14(3): 360 - 366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.-H. Li and J. L. Brown Reduction of maternal care: a new benefit of multiple mating? Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2002; 13(1): 87 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. C. Robertson, S. M. Degnan, J. Kikkawa, and C. C. Moritz Genetic monogamy in the absence of paternity guards: the Capricorn silvereye, Zosterops lateralis chlorocephalus, on Heron Island Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2001; 12(6): 666 - 673. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Slagsvold, A. Johnsen, H. M. Lampe, and J. T. Lifjeld Do female pied flycatchers seek extrapair copulations with familiar males? A test of the incomplete knowledge hypothesis Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2001; 12(4): 412 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. Hasselquist and P. W. Sherman Social mating systems and extrapair fertilizations in passerine birds Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2001; 12(4): 457 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Gomendio and P. Reguera Egg carrying in the golden egg bug (Phyllomorpha laciniata): parental care, parasitism, or both? Reply to Kaitala et al. Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2001; 12(3): 369 - 373. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. D. Jennions and D. A. Polakow The effect of partial brood loss on male desertion in a cichlid fish: an experimental test Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2001; 12(1): 84 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. P. Moller and J. J. Cuervo The evolution of paternity and paternal care in birds Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2000; 11(5): 472 - 485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|