Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pfennig, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Collins, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pfennig, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Collins, J. P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1994 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Kin recognition and cannibalism in polyphenic salamanders

David W. Pfennig, Paul W. Sherman and James P. Collins

Section of Neurobiology and Behaviour, Mudd Hall, Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853, USA Department of Zoology, Arizona State University Temple, AZ 85287, USA

ABSTRACT

We investigated kin discrimination among larvae of Arizona tiger salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum nebulosum) which occur as "typical" morphs that feed mostly on invertebrate prey and occasionally on conspecifics, and as "cannibal" morphs that feed primarily on conspecifics. When housed with smaller larvae that differed in relatedness, both cannibals and typicals preferentially consumed less-related individuals. Cannibals ate typicals much quicker when the choice was between nonkin and siblings than when the choice was between nonkin and cousins, indicating that cannibals could distinguish different categories of relatives. Cannibals were less likely to eat a larval sibling that was a cannibal morph than a sibling that was a typical morph. Occluding animals' nares temporarily eliminated kin discrimination, implying that olfaction is important in recognition. Larvae from different sibships varied considerably in their ability to discriminate kin, and the greater the probability that a larva from a given sibship would develop into a cannibal morph, the more likely the members of that sibship were to discriminate kin. Our results enable us to infer the functional significance of kin recognition in this species and to develop an evolutionary model of the mechanisms underlying the joint control of kin recognition and cannibalistic polyphenism.

Key words: cannibalism, kin recognition, polyphenism, tiger salamander.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
H. P. van der Jeugd, I. T. van der Veen, and K. Larsson
Kin clustering in barnacle geese: familiarity or phenotype matching?
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2002; 13(6): 786 - 790.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
D. W. Pfennig, J. P. Collins, and R. E. Ziemba
A test of alternative hypotheses for kin recognition in cannibalistic tiger salamanders
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 1999; 10(4): 436 - 443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.