Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Runkle, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lance, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Runkle, L. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lance, S. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1994 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Individual, nightly, and seasonal variation in calling behavior of the gray tree frog, Hyla versicolor: implications for energy expenditure

Laura S. Runkle, Kentwood D. Wells, Catherine C. Robb and Stacey L. Lance

Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology U-43, The University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269-3043, USA

Address correspondence to K.D. Wells. S. L. Lance is now atthe Department of Zoology, University of Maryland, CollegePark, MD 20742, USA.

ABSTRACT

We investigated individual, nightly, and seasonal variation in calling behavior of a population of gray tree frogs (Hyla versicolor) from Connecticut, USA. Repeated recordings of individual males on seven nights revealed significant differences among males in calling rate on all but one night and differences in number of pulses per call and number of pulses produced per hour (pulse effort) on four nights. Most males reduced calling activity late at night (after 2230 h), but some maintained a relatively steady rate of call production before dropping out of the chorus. Data collected for 26 individuals recorded on three or more nights throughout the breeding season revealed significant differences among males in calling rate, number of pulses per call, and pulse effort, but repeatabilities for all three variables were low (0.17, 0.35, and 0.12, respectively). The highest repeatability was for number of pulses per call, a variable strongly influenced by proximity to calling neighbors, probably because males often interacted with neighbors at similar distances on several successive nights. Males tended to reduce the number of pulses per call as the season progressed and the distance between neighbors decreased, but they showed no clear seasonal change in calling rate or pulse effort. There was a substantial seasonal decline in the number of hours of chorus activity, resulting in a median decrease of 43% in nightly energy expenditure by calling males.

Key words: Amphibia, Anura, energetics, Hyla versicolor, Hylidae, individual variation, seasonal variation, vocal behavior.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
H. C. Gerhardt, S. D. Tanner, C. M. Corrigan, and H. C. Walton
Female preference functions based on call duration in the gray tree frog (Hyla versicolor)
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2000; 11(6): 663 - 669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.