Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Creel, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Rabenold, K. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Creel, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Rabenold, K. N.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1994 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Inclusive fitness and reproductive strategies in dwarf mongooses

Scott R. Creel and Kerry N. Rabenold

Department of Biological Sciences,Purdue University West Lafayette, IN 47907,USA Frankfurt Zoological Society African Wild Dog Project Selous ConservationProgramme, PO Box 1519, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania,East Africa Rockefeller University Field Research Station, Tyrrel Road,Millbrook, NY 12545,USA

ABSTRACT

Dwarf mongooses (Helogale parvula) are small, communally breeding carnivores found in woodland and tree-savanna throughout Africa. Within a pack, socially subordinate mongooses do not normally breed, yet they invariably participate in all aspects of parental care. The primary alternative to tolerating reproductive suppression is dispersal, which shortens the wait for dominance and breeding. Here, we calculate the annual inclusive fitness payoffs to the dispersing and nondispersing strategies for males and females of ages one to seven, using data from a 14-year study in Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Factors with effects on inclusive fitness included relatedness to pack mates before and after dispersal, the effect of help on recipients' reproductive success, the probability of dispersing successfully, the probability of attaining dominance, and reproductive success after attaining dominance. All of these factors differed between male and female dwarf mongooses. We compared the contributions of direct and indirect fitness to the total fitness of mongooses pursuing each of the strategies, across a range of ages. In our population, dispersal and nondispersal both yielded direct and indirect payoffs at most ages. For dispersers of both sexes, direct fitness was the primary component of total fitness but indirect fitness was substantial for young (< 2 years old) dispersers. For nondispersers of both sexes, indirect fitness was the major component of total fitness among young mongooses (up to 2 or 3 years), but direct fitness was the major component among older mongooses. By comparing the inclusive fitness payoffs for the two strategies, we determined the range of ages at which dispersal should be favored for each sex. These comparisons correctly predicted that males should be more dispersive than females at all ages, and that males should disperse over a broader range of ages.

Key words: cooperative breeding, dispersal, dwarf mongoose, Helogale parvula, Herpestidae, inclusive fitness, kin selection, philopatry, Serengeti, social carnivores..


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
J. B Silk
The adaptive value of sociality in mammalian groups
Phil Trans R Soc B, April 29, 2007; 362(1480): 539 - 559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
M. A. Cant and S. English
Stable group size in cooperative breeders: the role of inheritance and reproductive skew
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2006; 17(4): 560 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
M. A. Cant and J. Field
Helping effort in a dominance hierarchy
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2005; 16(4): 708 - 715.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
N. Kolm, E.A. Hoffman, J. Olsson, A. Berglund, and A.G. Jones
Group stability and homing behavior but no kin group structures in a coral reef fish
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2005; 16(3): 521 - 527.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
G. M. Blundell, M. Ben-David, P. Groves, R. T. Bowyer, and E. Geffen
Kinship and sociality in coastal river otters: are they related?
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2004; 15(5): 705 - 714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
S. M. Durant, M. Kelly, and T. M. Caro
Factors affecting life and death in Serengeti cheetahs: environment, age, and sociality
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2004; 15(1): 11 - 22.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
A. S. Griffin, J. M. Pemberton, P. N. M. Brotherton, G. McIlrath, D. Gaynor, R. Kansky, J. O'Riain, and T. H. Clutton-Brock
A genetic analysis of breeding success in the cooperative meerkat (Suricata suricatta)
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2003; 14(4): 472 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.