Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sih, A.
Right arrow Articles by Krupa, J. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sih, A.
Right arrow Articles by Krupa, J. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Interacting effects of predation risk and male and female density on male/female conflicts and mating dynamics of stream water striders

Andrew Sih and James J. Krupa

Center for Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, T.H. Morgan School of Biological Sciences, University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506–0225, USA

ABSTRACT

We used a factorial experiment to examine interacting effects of male density, female density, and sunfish (predation risk) on mating dynamics of the stream water strider (Aquarius remigis). Many of our results corroborated earlier studies on the isolated effects of each factor on mating behavior. The effect of each factor, however, depended on the other factors. For example, in low density pools, predation risk decreased male general activity, male/female harassment rates, mating activity, and mating duration and increased the large male mating advantage. At higher densities, however, water striders apparently enjoyed "safety in numbers" and did not alter their mating dynamics in response to the presence of predators. Female activity showed a particularly complex response to male density and fish. When males were scarce, fish caused females to reduce their activity. However, when males were abundant, fish increased female activity, probably because fish decreased male activity thus releasing females from harassment by males. The three treatment factors also had interacting effects on male mating success. In the absence of fish, when females were scarce, increased male density resulted in a decrease in mean male mating success; however, when females were abundant, increased male density enhanced mean male mating success. In contrast, in the presence of fish, male density had little effect on male mating success. Many of the observed mating patterns can be explained by the effects of ecological and social factors on male/female conflicts; that is, on male harassment of females and female reluctance to mate.

Key words: Aquarius, insect mating systems, male/female conflicts, mating activity, mating duration, nonrandom mating by size, predation risk, sex ratio, streams, sunfish, water strider. [Behav Ecol 6: 316–325 (1995)].


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.