Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Redpath, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Redpath, S. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Impact of habitat fragmentation on activity and hunting behavior in the tawny owl, Strix aluco

S. M. Redpath

Institute of Terrestrial Ecology Monks Wood, Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire PE17 2LS, UK

ABSTRACT

I examined the effect of woodland fragmentation on activity and hunting behavior in the tawny owl. I made three predictions on the effect of fragmentation, two of which were upheld and one rejected. Over 2 years, 24 owls were radio tracked in the nonbreeding season. Eight of these were in continuous woodland and the rest in highly fragmented woodland. For each owl, I recorded data on small mammal availability, diet, home range size, perch time, and interperch distance. In accordance with the first two predictions, owls in fragmented woodlands had longer interperch distances and perch times, but contrary to the third prediction, perch times were positively correlated with small mammal density. This was thought to be due to owls altering their hunting to other prey types when small mammals were scarce. Within fragmented woodlands, perch times were the same between the sexes, but males had slightly greater interperch distances than females. Male owls in fragmented woods flew 40% further per hour than males in continuous woodland. For data throughout the night, food availability and area of trees in home range accounted for 65% of the variation in perch times. For data before 2200 h, area of trees alone accounted for the same amount of variation. The data suggest that habitat fragmentation, particularly through reducing woodland area, can greatly influence owl activity and hunting behavior.

Key words: activity, habitat fragmentation, hunting behavior, predator, Strix, tawny owl. [Behav Ecol 6:410–415 (1995)].


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.