Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tolonen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Korpimaki, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tolonen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Korpimaki, E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Parental effort of kestrels (Falco tinnunculus) in nest defense: effects of laying time, brood size, and varying survival prospects of offspring

Pasi Tolonena and Erkki Korpimakib

aDepartment of Zoology, University of Oulu FIN-90570 Oulu, Finland bLaboratory of Ecological Zoology, Department of Biology, University of Turku FIN-20500 Turku, Finland P. Tolonen is now at Sienitie 4C36, FIN-40640 Jyvaskyla, Finland.

ABSTRACT

We studied the nest defense behavior of Eurasian kestrels (Falco tinnunculus) towards a stuffed pine marten (Martes martes) through a 3-year vole cycle (1990–92) in western Finland. Survival probability of offspring decreases with a later start of breeding, and, therefore, early breeders should protect their offspring more than late ones. We found this true for males during the incubation period, but not for females. In addition, we expected the nest defense intensity to increase with offspring number. During the incubation period, this was true for females, but not for males. During the nestling phase, parents did not adjust their defense effort to natural or manipulated (by one to two young) brood size. Survival prospects of kestrel offspring were highest in the increasing vole year 1991 and lowest in the decreasing vole year 1992, and, therefore, we expected the defense activity of kestrels to follow the same trend. However, the opposite result appeared true for females with a similar tendency for males. Most hypotheses predicting avian nest defense behavior were not supported by our data. Temporally heterogeneous environment and low degree of nest-site tenacity of migratory kestrels may make them unfamiliar with environmental variation and survival prospects of their offspring. Therefore, fitness benefits of parental care are not predictable, and kestrels may thus adjust their parental effort to their own future reproductive potential (i.e., number of future breeding attempts), rather than to some current investment indicator, like offspring age and number.

Key words: brood size, future reproductive potential, parental care, raptor, survival prospects of offspring, vole cycle. [Behav Ecol 6: 435–441 (1995)].


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
P. Kontiainen, H. Pietiainen, K. Huttunen, P. Karell, H. Kolunen, and J. E. Brommer
Aggressive Ural owl mothers recruit more offspring
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2009; 20(4): 789 - 796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
J. J. Soler, M. Soler, T. Perez-Contreras, S. Aragon, and A. P. Moller
Antagonistic antiparasite defenses: nest defense and egg rejection in the magpie host of the great spotted cuckoo
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 1999; 10(6): 707 - 713.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.