Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Byers, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hogg, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Byers, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hogg, J. T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1995 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Environmental effects on prenatal growth rate in pronghorn and bighorn: further evidence for energy constraint on sex-biased maternal expenditure

John A. Byersa and John T. Hoggb

aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho Moscow, ID 83844, USA bCraighead Wildlife-Wildlands Institute, 5200 Upper Miller Creek Road, Missoula, MT 59803, USA

ABSTRACT

Byers and Moodie (1990) proposed that high levels of maternal expenditure in polygynous ungulates limit the ability of mothers to support elevated male fetal and neonatal growth rates. This hypothesis assumes that females in high-expenditure species are at or near the maximum level possible and that females in lower-expenditure species are not. To test this assumption, we examined our long-term data on reproduction of pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) and bighorn (Ovis canadensis) at the National Bison Range (western Montana, USA) and compared gestation lengths, birth weights, and prenatal growth rates of offspring born following summers of low versus average or above average precipitation. In bighorn, these variables were unaffected by the previous summer's rainfall, but in pronghorn, gestation length and prenatal growth rate were significantly lower following dry summers. Extended samples for both species confirmed earlier reports of sex-biased expenditure favoring males in bighorn and the absence of sex-bias in pronghorn. Bighorn prenatal litter growth rates and birth weights, corrected for maternal mass, are 63.5% and 38%, respectively, of pronghorn values. These data support the Byers and Moodie (1990) contention that females of high-expenditure species do not show differential expenditure by offspring sex because they are at a reproductive expenditure maximum, whereas females of lower-expenditure species are able to support excess expenditure in male offspring because optimal allocation to female offspring is farther from such a maximum.

Key words: environmental variation, maternal care, reproductive expenditure, sex difference. [Behav Ecol 6: 451–457 (1995)].


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
A. Kuhl, A. Mysterud, G. I Erdnenov, A. A Lushchekina, I. A Grachev, A. B Bekenov, and E.J Milner-Gulland
The 'big spenders' of the steppe: sex-specific maternal allocation and twinning in the saiga antelope
Proc R Soc B, May 22, 2007; 274(1615): 1293 - 1299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc R Soc BHome page
O. Holand, A. Mysterud, K. H Roed, T. Coulson, H. Gjostein, R. B Weladji, and M. Nieminen
Adaptive adjustment of offspring sex ratio and maternal reproductive effort in an iteroparous mammal
Proc R Soc B, February 7, 2006; 273(1584): 293 - 299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
A. Loison and O. Strand
Allometry and variability of resource allocation to reproduction in a wild reindeer population
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2005; 16(3): 624 - 633.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
M. Festa-Bianchet, J. T. Jorgenson, and D. Reale
Early development, adult mass, and reproductive success in bighorn sheep
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2000; 11(6): 633 - 639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.