| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 1996 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
research-article |
Behavioral responses of a sex-role reversed pipefish to a gradient of perceived predation risk
Department of Zoology, Villavagen 9, S-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden
ABSTRACT
Conspicuous behaviors such as courtship and mating often make animals susceptible to predation. When perceiving themselves at an elevated level of risk, animals frequently reduce conspicuous behaviors in tradeoff for a decrease in probability of being preyed upon. In the present study, we used two experiments to examine the effect of perceived predation risk from cod (Gadus morhud) on nonreproductive and reproductive behaviors in the sex-role reversed pipefish (Syngnathus typhle). In the first experiment, no differences due to predation risk were detected in the nonreproductive behaviors of either males or females. In the second experiment, predation risk had significant effects on reproductive behaviors. Pipefish were allowed to court and copulate at four different predation levels. We created predation levels differing in perceived predation risk by controlling the number of sensory modes through which pipefish could detect the presence of a cod. As predation risk increased, pipefish copulated and courted less frequently, swam alone (displayed and searched for conspecifics) less often, and waited longer before commencing courtship. These changes in behavior minimized the amount of time spent above the eelgrass and presumably reduced conspicuousness to visual predators. Pipefish also copulated after a smaller amount of courtship as predation risk increased, indicating that they may trade information concerning mate quality for a reduction in predation risk. No differences were found in any response variable between males and females. The role of operational sex ratios and intersexual competition in determining which sex assumes greater costs in mate acquisition is questioned.
Key words: courtship, information gathering, mate acquisition, pipefish, predation, reproductive behavior, Syngnathidae, trade-off.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Berglund and G. Rosenqvist An intimidating ornament in a female pipefish Behav. Ecol., September 15, 2008; (2008) arn114v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. M. Billing, G. Rosenqvist, and A. Berglund No terminal investment in pipefish males: only young males exhibit risk-prone courtship behavior Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2007; 18(3): 535 - 540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Berglund, M. S. Widemo, and G. Rosenqvist Sex-role reversal revisited: choosy females and ornamented, competitive males in a pipefish Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2005; 16(3): 649 - 655. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. B. Johnson and A. L. Basolo Predator exposure alters female mate choice in the green swordtail Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2003; 14(5): 619 - 625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Jones, A. Barabas, W. Elliott, and S. Parsons Female greater wax moths reduce sexual display behavior in relation to the potential risk of predation by echolocating bats Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2002; 13(3): 375 - 380. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Berglund and G. Rosenqvist Male pipefish prefer dominant over attractive females Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2001; 12(4): 402 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. G. Jones and J. C. Avise Mating Systems and Sexual Selection in Male-Pregnant Pipefishes and Seahorses: Insights from Microsatellite-Based Studies of Maternity J. Hered., March 1, 2001; 92(2): 150 - 158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. M. Dill, A. V. Hedrick, and A. Fraser Male mating strategies under predation risk: do females call the shots? Behav. Ecol., July 1, 1999; 10(4): 452 - 461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|