Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (47)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gerhardt, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Tanner, S. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gerhardt, H. C.
Right arrow Articles by Tanner, S. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Dynamic properties of the advertisement calls of gray tree frogs: patterns of variability and female choice

H. Carl Gerhardta, Miranda L. Dysonb, and Steven D. Tannera

aDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211, USA, bDepartment of Psychology, University of Durban, Durban, South Africa

M. L. Dyson is now at the Biology Department, Open University,Milton Keynes, UK.

ABSTRACT

We assessed the potential for several acoustic properties of the advertisement calls of male gray tree frogs to affect relative mating success by relating patterns of variation in these properties to minimum differences required to elicit female choice. Dynamic properties (pulse number, PN; call rate, CR; and duty cycle, DC, the ratio of call duration to call period) varied much more within bouts of calling than a static property (dominant frequency, DF) but nevertheless exhibited significant between male variation in three of four breeding seasons. Many multiply recorded males consistently produced calls with values substantially above or below mean values of males recorded on the same nights. Nightly ranges of variation in PN and CR were often greater than the minimum differences required to elicit female preferences in the laboratory. In most experiments, females chose high-PN or fast-CR calls over low-PN or slow-CR alternatives, respectively, even if the preferred stimuli were farther away or 6-10 dB lower in sound pressure level (SPL), provided that differences in PN or CR were 100%. Consistent with these results, females did not always choose the closer of two calling males in the field. Nightly ranges of variation in DF rarely equaled the minimum difference required to elicit SPL independent preferences. Females preferred a stimulus of high-PN and slow-CR over an alternative of low-PN or fast-CR with the same acoustic on-time; in two experiments, females chose calls of high-PN over low-PN alternatives even though the playback of the high-PN call was interrupted and the low-PN call was broadcast continuously. Thus, female preferences were not merely based on the total time of acoustic stimulation. Responses of females tested twice in the same experiment suggest that phenotypic variation in preference was limited in our study populations.

Key words: advertisement calls, Amphibia, Anura, distance-independent preference, dynamic acoustic properties, female choice, Hyla chrysoscelis, Hyla versicolor, individual variation in preference, repeatability, sexual selection, tree frog.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
A. T. Baugh and M. J. Ryan
Female tungara frogs vary in commitment to mate choice
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2009; 20(6): 1153 - 1159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
H. C. Gerhardt, S. D. Tanner, C. M. Corrigan, and H. C. Walton
Female preference functions based on call duration in the gray tree frog (Hyla versicolor)
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2000; 11(6): 663 - 669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.