| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 1996 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
research-article |
A comparative analysis of the evolution of variation in appearance of eggs of European passerines in relation to brood parasitism
Department of Population Biology, Zoological Institute, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark
ABSTRACT
Host of brood parasites increase the ability of rejecting cuckoo eggs by production of (1) a clutch with little variation among eggs and (2) a clutch that differs the most from the modal phenotype of the population. These hypotheses have been tested by Øien et at. (1995), although they did not control for common phylogenetic ancestry. We analyze the evolution of egg color and marking patterns in European passerines, which are potential hosts of die European cuckoo (Cuculus canorus), using Felsenstein's (1985) independent comparative method to control for the effect of common phylogenetic descent We found a significant positive relationship between interclutch variation in appearance of host eggs and parasitism rate, but this relationship disappeared when hole-nesting species were excluded from the analysis; and we found a highly significant multiple regression between rejection rate and intra- and interclutch variation in egg appearance, even when hole nesters were excluded from the analysis. The partial correlation coefficients were negative for intraclutch variation and positive with interclutch variation in agreement widi the hypotheses. Therefore, the use of the independent comparative method strengthens the hypothesis that the evolution of egg patterns in hosts is associated with different stages of coevolution with the brood parasite.
Key words: brood parasitism, coevolution, Cuculus canorus, egg recognition, evolution of pattern and color of host eggs.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. M Aviles, J. J Soler, and T. Perez-Contreras Dark nests and egg colour in birds: a possible functional role of ultraviolet reflectance in egg detectability Proc R Soc B, November 22, 2006; 273(1603): 2821 - 2829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Lahti Evolution of bird eggs in the absence of cuckoo parasitism PNAS, December 13, 2005; 102(50): 18057 - 18062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Sorenson and R. B. Payne Molecular Genetic Perspectives on Avian Brood Parasitism Integr. Comp. Biol., April 1, 2002; 42(2): 388 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. I. Rothstein, M. A. Patten, and R. C. Fleischer Phylogeny, specialization, and brood parasite--host coevolution: some possible pitfalls of parsimony Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2002; 13(1): 1 - 10. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Welbergen, J. Komdeur, R. Kats, and M. Berg Egg discrimination in the Australian reed warbler (Acrocephalus australis): rejection response toward model and conspecific eggs depending on timing and mode of artificial parasitism Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2001; 12(1): 8 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Soler Do life-history variables of European cuckoo hosts explain their egg-rejection behavior? Behav. Ecol., January 1, 1999; 10(1): 1 - 6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



