Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (36)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Briggs, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Dugatkin, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Briggs, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Dugatkin, L. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Mate-choice copying under predation risk in the Trinigadian guppy (Poecilia reticulata)

Stephanie E. Briggsa,, Jean-Guy J. Godina and Lee Alan Dugatkinb

aDepartment of Biology, Mount Allison University Sackville, New Brunswick E0A 3C0, Canada bDepartment of Biology, University of Louisville Louisville, KY 40292, USA

ABSTRACT

Although females of numerous species possess genetically-based preferences for certain male trails and male preferentially with males possessing these traits, recent theoretical and experimental evidence indicates that they may also copy (imitate) the mate choices of other females under certain circumstances. Such mate-choice copying is expected to be most prevalent when females have the opportunity to observe the mate choices of others and when mate choice is costly to females. One potential direct fitness cost of mate choice is increased individual risk of mortality due to predation. Here, we investigate for the first time the effect of increasing the apparent risk of predation on the tendency of females to copy the experimentally staged mate choice of another female. Using adult female guppies (Poecilia reticulata) originating from a Trinidadian population that experiences a relatively high fish predation pressure, we first establish that they possess a preference for the more brighdy colored of two simultaneously presented males in the absence of both mate-copying opportunity and an immediate threat of predation. However, most females reversed their initial mate preference when given an opportunity to copy the mate preference of another female in the absence of predation threat The proportion of females reversing their preference when given the opportunity to do so was not affected by increasing the apparent risk of (fish) predation. This result may be owing either to female guppies tending to copy the mate choice of others whenever the opportunity arises because the benefits of doing so accrue irrespective of the ambient risk of predation or to females choosing randomly between males with respect to their color pattern in the presence of the predator irrespective of mate-copying opportunity. These two explanations for the apparent lack of an effect of predation risk on mate-choice copying per se are both plausible but unfortunately could not be easily distinguished here. It may thus be possible, and interesting, that individual female guppies chose randomly between the available males in the presence of the predator but otherwise copied the choice of others when given the opportunity to do so.

Key words: copying, guppy, mate choice, Poecilia reticulata, predation risk, sexual selection, [Behav Ecol 7: 151–157 (1996)].


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
D. Goulet and T. L. Goulet
Nonindependent mating in a coral reef damselfish: evidence of mate choice copying in the wild
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2006; 17(6): 998 - 1003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
M. S. Widemo
Male but not female pipefish copy mate choice
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2006; 17(2): 255 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.