Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (55)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cotton, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cotton, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Chick begging as a signal: are nestlings honest?

Peter A. Cotton, Alex Kacelnik and Jonathan Wright1

Edward Grey Institute, Department of Zoology South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK 1now at the Department of Zoology Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK

ABSTRACT

Begging by dependent avian offspring is known to correlate with hunger level, and parents use this as a signal of brood demand to adjust their chick feeding behavior. While there is information on how each chick adjusts its begging to its own condition, little is known of how chicks adjust to the state of their nest mates. In two experiments we manipulated the competitive environment of individual European starling (Sturnus vulgaris) chicks by altering the state of nest mates while holding the state of target chicks constant In the first experiment we placed the target chick's nest mates in neighboring nests with brood sizes of two, five, or eight chicks. Following the manipulation we returned them to their own nests and recorded begging behavior on videotape. In the second experiment we separated a target chick from its siblings and manipulated feeding level in the laboratory. The siblings were fed at one of three levels; meanwhile, all the target chicks were fed at the intermediate level. After the manipulation we placed the target chicks with their siblings and recorded their begging in response to an artificial stimulus. In neither experiment was the begging effort of the unmanipulated target chicks affected by the changes in begging behavior of their siblings. This result supports the view that begging is a reliable signal of individual chick state and does not involve responses to the effort of nest mates.

Key words: begging, parent-offspring conflict, signaling, starling, Sturnus vulgaris, [Behav Ecol 7: 178–182 (1996)].


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
M. A. Rodriguez-Girones, J. M. Zuniga, and T. Redondo
Feeding experience and relative size modify the begging strategies of nestlings
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2002; 13(6): 782 - 785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
A. S. Kitaysky, J. C. Wingfield, and J. F. Piatt
Corticosterone facilitates begging and affects resource allocation in the black-legged kittiwake
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2001; 12(5): 619 - 625.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
J. P. Granadeiro, M. Bolton, M. C. Silva, M. Nunes, and R. W. Furness
Responses of breeding Cory's shearwater Calonectris diomedea to experimental manipulation of chick condition
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2000; 11(3): 274 - 281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
M. L. Leonard, A. G. Horn, A. Gozna, and S. Ramen
Brood size and begging intensity in nestling birds
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2000; 11(2): 196 - 201.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. A. Rodriguez-Girones, M. Enquist, and P. A. Cotton
Instability of signaling resolution models of parent-offspring conflict
PNAS, April 14, 1998; 95(8): 4453 - 4457.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.