Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (44)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burley, N. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lundy, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Burley, N. T.
Right arrow Articles by Lundy, K.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Sexual selection and extrapair fertilization in a socially monogamous passerine, the zebra finch (Taeniopygia gullata)

Nancy Tyler Burleya, Patricia G. Parkerb and Kimberly Lundyb

aDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92717-2525, USA bDepartment of Zoology, 1735 Neil Avenue, The Ohio State University Columbus, OH 43210, USA

ABSTRACT

We investigated paternal exclusion rate (the percentage of young reared by a male that were not his genetic offspring), and behavioral and reproductive variables influencing this rate, in a freely breeding laboratory population of zebra finches (Tae-niopygia guttala castanotis), a socially monogamous grassfinch. Prior to the experiment, each male founder was fitted with either two red bands (creating a phenotype previously demonstrated to be attractive to females) or two green bands (unattractive to females) as part of a unique combination of four leg bands. The overall paternal exclusion rate was 28%, as determined by multilocus, minisatellite DNA fingerprinting of 278 offspring reared by 26 males and their mates. Mean exclusion rates were 16% and 40% for red- and green-banded males, respectively. Exclusion rates were directly proportional to rates of female participation in unforced extrapair copulations (UEPCs) with red-banded males that occurred when females were fertile. Rates of fertile, forced extrapair copulations (FEPCs) and fertile UEPCs involving green-banded males either failed to influence exclusion rate or varied inversely with exclusion rate, indicating that extrapair fertilization (EPF) is under female control. Effort devoted by males to seeking EPFs increased exclusion rate. Results suggest that males place greater effort into seeking fertile versus infertile EPCs and that unattractive males accrue fitness gains through high parental investment (PI), whereas attractive males benefit through decreased PI and increased allocation to EPF.

Key words: extrapair fertilization, sexual selection, social monogamy, Tacniopygia guttala, [Behav Ecol 7: 218–226 (1996)].


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
A.N. Rutstein, H.E. Gorman, K.E. Arnold, L. Gilbert, K.J. Orr, A. Adam, R. Nager, and J.A. Graves
Sex allocation in response to paternal attractiveness in the zebra finch
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2005; 16(4): 763 - 769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
N. T. Burley and J. D. Calkins
Sex ratios and sexual selection in socially monogamous zebra finches
Behav. Ecol., November 1, 1999; 10(6): 626 - 635.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
M.-C. Gontard-Danek and A. P. Moller
The strength of sexual selection: a meta-analysis of bird studies
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 1999; 10(5): 476 - 486.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
M. K. Schwartz, D. J. Boness, C. M. Schaeff, P. Majluf, E. A. Perry, and R. C. Fleischer
Female-solicited extrapair matings in Humboldt penguins fail to produce extrapair fertilizations
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 1999; 10(3): 242 - 250.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.