Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kraak, S. B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Weissing, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kraak, S. B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Weissing, F. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Female preference for nests with many eggs: a cost-benefit analysis of female choice in fish with paternal care

Sarah B. M. Kraaka and Franz J. Weissingb

aZoological Laboratory, University of Groningen The Netherlands bDepartment of Genetics, University of Groningen The Netherlands

ABSTRACT

In several fish species with paternal care, females prefer males guarding many eggs in their nest. This preference might be advantageous because the presence of many other eggs dilutes the risk of newly laid eggs being eaten by the father. To evaluate this hypothesis quantitatively, we constructed a simulation model that mimics the breeding biology of the blenny Aidablennius sphynx. In contrast to earlier verbal models, the costs of choice are explicitly taken into account We systematically varied factors such as the stringency of choosiness and the level and nature of the costs of choice. For realistic parameter values female choosiness may result in a fitness advantage of more than 50%. The optimal choice strategy created a distribution of eggs over the nests which resembles that found in the field for A. sphynx. Our model shows that the relative fitness of a choice strategy is not constant but frequency dependent in a complicated way. If most females are choosy, a bimodal distribution of eggs over the nests results, with many nests containing few and some nests containing many eggs. In such a situation choosiness is profitable, since randomly laying females will often lay their eggs in nests with few eggs, producing a high mortality per egg due to filial cannibalism. If, on the other hand, only few choosers are present, their influence on the egg distribution is limited. A unimodal distribution results which is profitable for nonchoosers, since the average egg mortality is low and nonchoosers do not bear the costs of choice. The positive relation between chooser frequency and chooser fitness makes it easy to understand why choosiness is evolutionarily stable. However, it is not obvious how the trait is established by selection in the first place.[Behav Ecol 7: 353–361 (1996)

Key words: Aidablennius sphynx, costs of choice, dilution effect, fish, evolutionary stability, female choice, frequency dependent selection, paternal care, simulation model.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
M. Lissaker, C. Kvarnemo, and O. Svensson
Effects of a low oxygen environment on parental effort and filial cannibalism in the male sand goby, Pomatoschistus minutus
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2003; 14(3): 374 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.