Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carbone, C.
Right arrow Articles by Taborsky, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Carbone, C.
Right arrow Articles by Taborsky, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

other

Mate choice or harassment avoidance? A question of female control at the lek

Chris Carbone and Michael Taborsky

Konrad Lorenz-Institut, für vergleichende Verhaltensforschung Sa-voyenstraße la, A-1160 Wien, Austria

ABSTRACT

Recent studies on the reproductive behavior of fallow deer, Dama dama, propose that harassment from nonterritorial males has a major influence on female movements and mate selection, leading ultimately to the evolution of lek mating in this species. In order to support this statement, one must demonstrate that female movements between lek and isolated territories, and among lek males, lead to a reduction in levels of harassment. We argue that current evidence in favor of this view is inconclusive. A quantification of the total harassment costs experienced by females in lek and isolated territories has never been made. In addition, female movements within the lek may actually lead to higher levels of disruption and harassment: The rate at which females join male territories increases with harem size (the number of females present in the territory), even though harems are disrupted increasingly with size due to a higher frequency of intrusions by nonterritorial males. Females also join male territories at a higher rate while these males are engaged in copulatory sequences, but copulatory sequences are again associated with high levels of disruption and harem instability. In the above studies it is argued that females are nonselective in their mating preferences. This assessment is based on the finding that males that adopt different reproductive strategies do not differ in their mating rates. Here mating rate is measured as the number of copulations received per female-hour. There are a number of reasons, however, why females exhibiting mating preferences might remain longer with preferred males, and so the above preference measure cannot be used to exclude the possibility that females are selective. More research is required to identify the major factors influencing patterns of mate selection and the evolution of leks in this species. We suggest a number of field tests that may help to identify these factors.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
J. Bro-Jorgensen
No peace for estrous topi cows on leks
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2003; 14(4): 521 - 525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Bro-Jorgensen
From the Cover: Overt female mate competition and preference for central males in a lekking antelope
PNAS, July 9, 2002; 99(14): 9290 - 9293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
J. Carranza and J. Valencia
Red deer females collect on male clumps at mating areas
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 1999; 10(5): 525 - 532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.