Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baird, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Dill, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Baird, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Dill, L. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Ecological and social determinants of group size in transient killer whales

Robin W. Baird and Lawrence M. Dill

Behavioural Ecology Research Group, Department of Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University Burnaby, British Columbia V5A 1S6, Canada

Address correspondence and reprint requests to R. W. aird, Marine Mammal Research Group, Box 6244, Victoria, British Columbia V8p 5l5, Canada, E-mail: rbaird{at}uvic.ca

ABSTRACT

Most analyses of the relationship between group size and food intake of social carnivores have shown a discrepancy between the group size that maximizes energy intake and that which is most frequently observed. Around southern Vancouver Island, British Columbia, killer whales of the so-called transient form forage in small groups, and appear to prey exclusively on marine mammals. Between 1986 and 1993, in approximately 434 h of observations on transient killer whales, we observed 138 attacks on five species of marine mammals. Harbor seals were most frequently attacked (130 occasions), and the observed average energy intake rate was more than sufficient for the whale's energetic needs. Energy intake varied with group size, with groups of three having the highest energy intake rate per individual. While groups of three were most frequently encountered, the group size experienced by an average individual in the population (i.e., typical group size) is larger than three. However, comparisons between observed and expected group sizes should utilize only groups engaged in the behavior of interest. The typical size of groups consisting only of adult and subadult whales that were engaged primarily in foraging activities confirms that these individuals are found in groups that are consistent with the maximization of energy intake hypothesis. Larger groups may form for (1) the occasional hunting of prey other than harbor seals, for which the optimal foraging group size is probably larger than three; and (2) the protection of calves and other social functions. Key words: dispersal, foraging, group hunting, harbor seals, killer whales, optimal group size, social structure. [Behav Ecol 7: 408-416 (1996)]

Key words: dispersal, foraging, group hunting, harbor seals, killer whales, optimal group size, social structure.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J HeredHome page
M. T. Weinrich, H. Rosenbaum, C Scott Baker, A. L. Blackmer, and H. Whitehead
The Influence of Maternal Lineages on Social Affiliations among Humpback Whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) on Their Feeding Grounds in the Southern Gulf of Maine
J. Hered., May 1, 2006; 97(3): 226 - 234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
G. Beauchamp and E. Fernandez-Juricic
The group-size paradox: effects of learning and patch departure rules
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2005; 16(2): 352 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
L. Gygax
Evolution of group size in the dolphins and porpoises: interspecific consistency of intraspecific patterns
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2002; 13(5): 583 - 590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. G. Ross and L. Keller
Genetic control of social organization in an ant
PNAS, November 24, 1998; 95(24): 14232 - 14237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.