Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Belovsky, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Chase, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Belovsky, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Chase, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Mating strategies based on foraging ability: an experiment with grasshoppers

Gary E. Belovsky, Jennifer B. Slade and Jonathan M. Chase

Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, College of Natural Resources and Ecology Center, Utah State University Logan, UT 84322-5210, USA

ABSTRACT

Female mate choice and the benefits of this behavior are critical aspects of Darwinian sexual selection, but they are seldom documented because it is difficult to identify the male trait(s) that females may be seeking. We conducted experiments with grasshoppers (Melanoplus sangutnipes: Orthoptera, Acrididae) to examine this behavior. Males that feed more intensively and select a diet mix that permits greater food intake (food intake per body mass per time) in laboratory trials were preferentially selected by females. These better foraging males on average provide greater paternal investment (greater spermatophore mass) to the female, which increases her reproductive rate (eggs produced per body mass per time). However, paternal investment may not entirely explain female choice of better foraging males, because these males were still selected even if they had their food intake restricted or had been allowed to recently mate, which reduces spermatophore production. Furthermore, males change their mating strategy in response to female choice and the foraging abilities of surrounding males. Poorer foraging males attempt forcible copulation rather than displaying and allowing female choice. A male will facultatively switch between these strategies depending on the foraging abilities of the surrounding males. While females attempt to reject forcible copulation, forcible copulation reduces the frequency with which females successfully copulate with better foraging males. Therefore, males that are less "attractive" to females adopt alternative mating strategies to counter female choice which would exclude them from mating.[Behav Ecol 7: 438–444 (1996)]

Key words: female choice, mating strategies, foraging, grasshoppers.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
G. R. Kolluru and G. F. Grether
The effects of resource availability on alternative mating tactics in guppies (Poecilia reticulata)
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2005; 16(1): 294 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.