Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirvonen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ranta, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hirvonen, H.
Right arrow Articles by Ranta, E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1996 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Within-bout dynamics of diet choice

Heikki Hirvonen and Esa Ranta

Integrative Ecology Unit, Division of Population Biology, Department of Ecology and Systematics PO Box 17, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland

ABSTRACT

Conventional diet theories mostly ignore dynamics in prey selectivity during a foraging bout However, results from experiments with several aquatic predator species showed that, as more prey were eaten, the predators included more of the initially less profitable (small) prey types in their diets. We also found that handling times of the initially more profitable (large) prey types increased with prey sequence, but handling times of the small prey remained constant Consequently, relative profitability of the large prey declined over the foraging trials. We modeled prey choice by incorporating the change in handling time as a function of prey sequence. The model predicts a shift in diet as the relative prey values change during a foraging period. The predictions qualitatively match the empirical data. In addition, simulations over the foraging bout showed that adopting the strategy using updated profitabilities always gives higher or at least as high total energetic gain as the fixed strategy based on the classical optimal prey-choice model. These results imply that the predators reevaluate prey profitabilities and adjust their selectivity accordingly in the course of foraging, without abandoning rate maximization. We suggest that dynamics of diet choice may in part account for partial preferences frequently observed in studies on prey selection.[Behav Ecol 7: 494–500 (1996)]

Key words: foraging behavior, foraging models, handling time, optimal foraging, partial preferences, prey selection, profitability.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.