Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (72)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chittka, L.
Right arrow Articles by Kunze, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chittka, L.
Right arrow Articles by Kunze, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Foraging dynamics of bumble bees: correlates of movements within and between plant species

Lars Chittkaa,b,, Andreas Gumberta and Jan Kunzea

aInstitut für Neurobiologie, Freie Universitiät Berlin Königin-Luise-Str.28-30, 14195 Berlin, Germany bEcology and Evolution, State University of New York Stony Brook, NY 11794-5245, USA

Address correspondence to L. Chittka. Ecology and Evolution, State Univenity of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794-5245, USA.

ABSTRACT

What rules determine whether bumble bees continue exploiting plants of the species just visited or switch to another species? To tackle this question, we recorded handling times and flight times from bees foraging in a natural meadow containing five plant species. Inter- and intra-specific plant distances were quantified. The bee-subjective colors of the five species were determined; two of these species had similar colors and structures, while three species were distinct from all others. The following rules were identified: (1) The decision to switch species was correlated with previous flower handling time, which we assume is a function of the reward amount received at the flower. After short handling times, the probability of switching to another species increased, whereas it decreased after long handling times. This difference became even greater if the bee had had a run of several short or several long handling times. (2) Constant flights (those between flowers of the same species) and transition flights (those between flowers of different species) followed stereotyped temporal patterns independent of the distances between flowers. Constant flights within five plant species consistently had median durations of about 2 seconds, whereas median transition times between species took 3–6 seconds. (3) This temporal rule broke down, however, if the flowers of two species had similar colors, in which case transition flights had equal dynamics as constant flights. (4) Bees switched more frequently from rare than from common species but even more frequently between similar species. We conclude that the bees' choices were determined by a set of rules that guided them to stay with the current plant species as long as flowers were rewarding and available within close distance but to switch to another species if flowers offered low rewards or were not encountered at close range

Key words: bumble bees, Bombus, flower color, flower constancy, foraging, pollination ecology, switching.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
Y. Camlitepe and V. Aksoy
First evidence of fine colour discrimination ability in ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)
J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2010; 213(1): 72 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J R Soc InterfaceHome page
N. E Raine, D. K. Rossmo, and S. C Le Comber
Geographic profiling applied to testing models of bumble-bee foraging
J R Soc Interface, March 6, 2009; 6(32): 307 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
J. G. Burns and J. D. Thomson
A test of spatial memory and movement patterns of bumblebees at multiple spatial and temporal scales
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 48 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Zhang, F. Bock, A. Si, J. Tautz, and M. V. Srinivasan
Visual working memory in decision making by honey bees
PNAS, April 5, 2005; 102(14): 5250 - 5255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
C. G. Galizia, J. Kunze, A. Gumbert, A.-K. Borg-Karlson, S. Sachse, C. Markl, and R. Menzel
Relationship of visual and olfactory signal parameters in a food-deceptive flower mimicry system
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2005; 16(1): 159 - 168.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A. G. Dyer and L. Chittka
Bumblebee search time without ultraviolet light
J. Exp. Biol., April 15, 2004; 207(10): 1683 - 1688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Exp. Biol.Home page
P. G. Kevan, L. Chittka, and A. G. Dyer
Limits to the salience of ultraviolet: lessons from colour vision in bees and birds
J. Exp. Biol., March 9, 2002; 204(14): 2571 - 2580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
J. Kunze and A. Gumbert
The combined effect of color and odor on flower choice behavior of bumble bees in flower mimicry systems
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2001; 12(4): 447 - 456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.