Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maigret, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, M. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Maigret, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Murphy, M. T.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Costs and benefits of parental care in eastern kingbirds

Jennifer L. Maigret and Michael T. Murphy

Department of Biology, Hartwick College Oneonta, NY 13820, USA

Address correspondence to M.T. Murphy. J. L. Maigret is now at the Department of Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

ABSTRACT

We manipulated brood sizes of eastern kingbirds (Tyrannus tyrannus) to measure the costs and benefits of parental care and to test whether kingbirds showed evidence of individual optimization of reproductive effort. We found that the number of feeding trips (trips/h) increased and that per capita feeding rates (trips/nestling/h) declined as brood size increased. The decline in per capita feeding rates was mostly due to high feeding rate to broods of one: parents made roughly equal number of trips to feed each nestling in broods of two to five. Nonetheless, nestling mass declined with brood size, probably because large broods were fed more small prey. Nestling condition (mass adjusted for structural size) differed only between broods of one and five. After controlling for effects of brood size, feeding rates had no supplementary influence on either nestling size or condition, but productivity and feeding rate were positively and significantly related. Adult male condition did not vary with brood size, manipulated brood size, or total feeding rate, but declined as the pair's per capita feeding rates increased. In addition, males that returned to breed were in better condition before leaving for migration than those that failed to return. Female condition tended to decline, and the probability of returning to breed dropped when broods were enlarged. However, female condition was independent of the probability of returning. Our results show that high feeding rates were costly, but that they carried benefits (greater productivity). Some evidence for individual optimization of reproductive effort existed: variability in nestling and adult female condition were better explained by changes in brood size than by the actual number of young in the nest. However, most evidence supported the alternative that increased brood size was equally costly for all birds

Key words: body condition, clutch size, cost of reproduction, feeding rate, individual optimization, kingbird, parental care, survivorship.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
J. M. Tinbergen and C. Both
Is clutch size individually optimized?
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 1999; 10(5): 504 - 509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.