Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Molumby, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Molumby, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Why make daughters larger? Maternal sex-allocation and sex-dependent selection for body size in a mass-provisioning wasp, Trypoxylon politum

Alan Molumby

Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago 1101 East 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA

ABSTRACT

Mass-provisioning wasps package maternal investment into brood cells, sealed structures that contain all the provisions necessary for an offspring's growth and development. Optimal sex-allocation theory predicts that if maternal provisions determine the size of each offspring, and the amount of provisions available to each offspring varies, females should allocate well-stocked brood cells to the sex that benefits most from being large. I tested this hypothesis using observations of organ-pipe wasps, Trypoxylon politum, and dissections of their nests. A Mississippi population of T. politum was intensively studied from 1993 to 1995. This population fit the assumptions of optimal sex-allocation models by Green and Brockmann and Grafen. Female weight at emergence was 1.29 times that of males, and wing length was 1.15 times that of males. This discrepancy in size occurred because the volume of parental provisions strongly influenced adult body size, and better-stocked brood cells were preferentially allocated to daughters. Brood-cell volume correlated with both wing length and weight at emergence in both sexes, and the chance that a given brood cell contained a female offspring increased with increasing brood-cell volume. Fitness was positively related to body size for females, but I found no evidence of an advantage to large males. Although there was evidence of stabilizing selection for male wing length in one year, there was no evidence of an increasing relationship between body size and fitness (directional selection) for males in either 1993 or 1994. Female fecundity was positively related to body size in both years, indicating that larger females have increased reproductive success. The rate at which females provisioned brood cells was also correlated with body size. Observed patterns of investment in brood cells are quantitatively consistent with the predictions of optimal sex-allocation theory, but certain aspects of female provisioning behavior suggest females are not following a single "optimal" strategy. Patterns of provisioning were variable among different females at the study site during the same year. Large females tended to produce larger offspring. Although Brockmann and Grafen's model predicts a single, population wide "switchpoint" from the production of male to female offspring, there was no evidence for such a switchpoint

Key words: body size, natural selection, organ-pipe wasps, sex allocation, sexual dimorphism, Trypoxylon politum.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
K. Seidelmann
Open-cell parasitism shapes maternal investment patterns in the Red Mason bee Osmia rufa
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2006; 17(5): 839 - 848.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.