Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simmons, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Simmons, R. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Why don't all siblicidal eagles lay insurance eggs? The egg quality hypothesis

Robert E. Simmons

Department of Zoology, Uppsala University Villavágen 9, s 752-36, Uppsala, Sweden

ABSTRACT

Several species of birds lay second eggs that are eliminated by the siblicidal behavior of the first-hatched chick. A widely accepted explanation for the occurrence of these second eggs is insurance against complete nest failure. However, if insurance is seen as an important breeding strategy for two-egg (c/2) layers, the question arises why single-egg species do not lay insurance eggs. The insurance-egg hypothesis predicts that extra eggs should occur where hatch failure is not trivial, which may be particularly prevalent in dense populations. Neither prediction was supported for siblicidal l Wahlberg's eagles Aquila wahlberge Neither could food constraints or allometric relationships explain the small one-egg clutch (c/1) of this species Instead, clutch size was experimentally shown to be related to optimal brood size: parents given two young were unable to rear them, and subsequent breeding opportunities were significantly curtailed. Since clutch and brood size are similarly related in c/2 eagles, insurance may be an exaptation of the second egg. One-egg spedes, however, appear to trade second (insurance) eggs for large, high-quality eggs, which enhance hatchability and chick viability. This was borne out by comparison of the world's c/1 eagles, which lay significantly (p<.01) larger eggs than c/2 eagles of the same body size. Large Wahlberg's eagle eggs also showed significantly (p=.02) greater hatchability than small eggs, and other studies show enhanced survival/quality for chicks from large eggs. Because only longer-lived eagles traded two eggs for single, large eggs, this is consistent with the idea of selection for offspring quality in long-lived species. I condude that higher hatchability of single, large eggs decreases the need for an insurance egg and simultaneously enhances viability of resultant chicks in sibliddal eagles and possibly sulids.

Key words: Aquila wahlbergi, brood manipulations, egg quality, insurance, siblicide, Wahlberg's eagle.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
L. D. Clifford and D. J. Anderson
Clutch size variation in the Nazca booby: a test of the egg quality hypothesis
Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2002; 13(2): 274 - 279.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
L. D. Clifford and D. J. Anderson
Experimental demonstration of the insurance value of extra eggs in an obligately siblicidal seabird
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2001; 12(3): 340 - 347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.