Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (31)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rothley, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cohon, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rothley, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Cohon, J. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Foraging to balance conflicting demands: novel insights from grasshoppers under predation risk

K. D. Rothley, Oswald J. Schmitz and Jared L. Cohon

School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Greeley Laboratory, Yale University 370 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06511, USA

ABSTRACT

Animal foraging may be influenced by multiple demands simultaneously (e g., nutrient gain and predator avoidance). Conventional approaches to understand the trade-offs between these demands require cramming them in similar currencies, which is impractical in many field situations. We introduce a new method, called multiobjective programming, as a framework to explore how animals balance conflicting demands. Multiobjective programming allows one to explore the influence of foraging demands directly, without explicit assumptions about how they enter into fitness and without conversion to some common currency. Using multiobjective programming, we show that, as foraging demands change, animals may adaptively adjust their behavior, even if the constraints on feasible behavior are unaffected (contrary to the predictions of the conventional models). Hence, we may see a variable response in foraging that is consistent with adaptive behavior. We used an empirical test with herbivore grasshoppers and predator spiders to evaluate the utility of multiobjective programming Our experiments show that grasshoppers are able to optimally balance the foraging objectives of energy intake and vigilance under changing levels of predation risk. The multiobjective model is used both to evaluate the biological significance of the broad variation that was observed in the grasshoppers' foraging behavior and to quantify explicitly the trade-off between energy intake and predator avoidance.

Key words: adaptive behaviour, Melanopius femurrubrum, multiobjective optimization, optimal foraging, single-objective optimization, trade-offs, variability.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Exp. Biol.Home page
A.-C. Mailleux, C. Detrain, and J.-L. Deneubourg
Starvation drives a threshold triggering communication
J. Exp. Biol., November 1, 2006; 209(21): 4224 - 4229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
T. A. Blackledge and J. W. Wenzel
Do stabilimenta in orb webs attract prey or defend spiders?
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 1999; 10(4): 372 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.