Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Birks, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Birks, S. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Paternity in the Australian brush-turkey, Alectura lathami, a megapode bird with uniparental male care

Sharon M. Birks

Section of Neurobiology and Behavior, Seeley G.Mudd Hall, Cornell University Ithaca, NY14853, USA

ABSTRACT

Male Australian brush-turkeys, Alectura lathami, provide all parental care by building and tending large incubation mounds. Females visit and lay eggs in the mounds of several males sequentially, but they provide no parental care after laying. Because males and females meet only briefly at mounds to copulate and lay, males have no obvious means of ensuring paternity. I used DNA fingerprinting techniques to determine paternity for 65 brush-turkey chicks. Eighteen chicks (27.7%) did not match the mound-tending male. Some of these paternity exclusions were evidently caused by females switching rapidly from one mound to another, but the majority (23.1% of eggs) appeared to result from females copulating with males other than the one in whose mound they were currently laying. However, the frequency of these copulations (43%) was much lower than the estimated frequency with which they fertilized eggs, perhaps because their timing during the ovulatory cycle differed relative to most other copulations. The percentage of eggs excluded in paternity analyses ranged from 20.0% to 43.8% for individual males but did not appear to affect male parental care. Several factors favor male parental care regardless of paternity. Males can accommodate eggs from several females in one mound, which increases the opportunities for additional matings without increasing the cost of parental care. In addition, paternity appears to be unpredictable and hard to assess, and a facultative reduction in care would be difficult without abandoning a mound entirely.

Key words: Alectura lathami, Australian brush-turkey, DNA fingerprinting, extrapair copulation, male parental care, megapode, paternity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
O. Rios-Cardenas and M. S. Webster
Paternity and paternal effort in the pumpkinseed sunfish
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2005; 16(5): 914 - 921.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
C. Spottiswoode and A. P. Moller
Extrapair paternity, migration, and breeding synchrony in birds
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2004; 15(1): 41 - 57.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.