Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Paszkowaki, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jones, H. M.
Right arrow Articles by Paszkowaki, C. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Effects of northern pike on patterns of nest use and resproductive behavior of male fathead minnows in a boreal lake

Hilary M. Jones and Cynthis A. Paszkowaki

Department of Biology Sciences, University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, T6C 2E9, Canada

ABSTRACT

We conducted a two-part study to assets predator avoidance by reproductive male fathead minnows (Pimephales promelos) subjected to predation threat from northern pike (Esox lucius). First, we determined if patterns of nest use by egg-guarding male minnows in a boreal lake were related to pike densities. We sampled northern pike and identified four areas of "high pike-density" and three areas of "low pike-density." We censused natural nests and placed nest boards in these areas. We found eggs on natural nests more frequently in areas with low densities of pike than in areas with high densities of pike. However, we could not fully explain the distribution of nests by predation risk. Second, we evaluated the behavioral response of egg-guarding males to a control stimulus (a piece of wood) or a live pike in a wire cage. We used time to return to the nest after a stimulus as a measure of risk taking. Males took different amounts of risk based on predation threat; males in the predator treatment took longer to return to their nests than control males. Risk taking was not related to the number or age of the eggs but to distance to nearest egg-guarding neighbor; males with close neighbors returned sooner than more isolated males. Males in the predator treatment had lower total activity and egg rubbing than control males after they returned to their nests. We conclude that male fathead minnows altered their reproductive behavior in ways that reduced predation risk, but the cost of predator avoidance might include egg predation, lost mating opportunities, or usurpation of nests

Key words: egg–guarding, encounter rate, Esox lucius, Pimephales promelas, predation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
I. Barber, D. Nairn, and F. A. Huntingford
Nests as ornaments: revealing construction by male sticklebacks
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2001; 12(4): 390 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.