Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whitehouse, M. E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Whitehouse, M. E. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

The benefits of stealing from a predator: foraging rates, predation risk, and intraspecific aggression in the kleptoparasitic spider Argyrodes antipodiana

Mary E. A. Whitehouse

Zoology Department, Univercity of Canterbury Christchurch, New Zealand

ABSTRACT

In the trade-off between food and safety, the role of aggressive intraspecific interactions has not been extensively examined. Here I present information on this system using a kleptoparasitic spider, Argyrodts antipodiana, and its host spider and potential predator, Eriophora pustulosa. A. antipodiana can feed either at a potentially dangerous site (the hub of its host's web with the host), or at a relatively safe site (on food bundles around the edge of the host's web). I found that A. antipodiana can gain food very quickly when feeding with the host, apparently by exploiting the host's ability to digest the prey. Thus A. antipodiana follows predictions based on foraging models in that it accepts a higher predation risk at the hub because of the higher food payoff. A. antipodiana also aggressively competes for access to more food. However, aggressive competition increases the predation risk from the host, especially at tile hub where the host is very close. Consequently, A. antipodiana modifies its level of intraspecific aggressiveness in accordance with its position on the web: at the hub, where the cost of aggression is high (due to predation risk), A. antipodiana reduces its aggressiveness, but it is aggressive away from the hub when competing for food bundles. The ability of A. antipodiana to change interaction intensity as a function of its position on the web enables it to exploit a rich, but risky, food source and provides a new angle for examining food and safety trade offs in light of intraspecific competition for food

Key words: Argyrodes antipodiana, foraging, intraspecific aggression, kleptoparasite, predation risk, spider, trade–offs.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.