Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chao, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chao, L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1997 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Evolution of polyandry in a communal breeding system

Lin Chao

Department of Zoology, University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742, USA

ABSTRACT

The evolution of polyandry requires an asymmetrical factor that favors more matings per breeding female than per breeding male, thus reversing Bateman's principle. Here a model is presented for the evolution of avian cooperative polyandry. The model shows that polyandry can evolve if communal breeding is initially advantageous and if increasing clutch size beyond an optimum is detrimental. The advantage of communal breeding favors the addition of more breeders (either males or females) and thus selects against breeding as single pairs (monogamy). The optimal dutch size creates the asymmetry that favors adding male breeders (polyandry) over adding female breeders (polygyny). Adding females is detrimental because females must lay eggs to reproduce and can therefore increase the clutch size of the group. On the other hand, males can reproduce by sharing paternity without increasing dutch size. It is shown that cooperative polyandry evolves either because it maximizes both male and female fitness or because polygyny and monogamy are behaviorally unstable. Data from acorn woodpeckers support the assumptions of the model and suggest that cooperative polyandry evolved because it is behaviorally more stable. The persistence of monogamy and polygyny in acorn woodpeckers (at a lower incidence than polyandry) is also examined. Polygyny in these birds represents a case of the Prisoner's Dilemma

Key words: acorn woodpeckers, communal breeding, cooperative polyandry, polyandry, Melanerpes formicivorus, optimal clutch size, polygyny, Prisoner's Dilemma.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
S. L. Vehrencamp
Evolutionary routes to joint-female nesting in birds
Behav. Ecol., May 1, 2000; 11(3): 334 - 344.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.