| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 1998 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
research-article |
Decoupling of reproductive rates and parental expenditure in a polyandrous butterfly
Department of of Zoology, University of Stockholm S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
ABSTRACT
Current theory postulates that the operational sex ratio (OSR) determines the relative degree of mating competition in the two sexes and is in turn influenced by a sexual difference in the potential reproductive rate (PRR) denned as 1/time out, where time out is the time an individual must spend recovering from a bout of mating activity and/or caring for offspring. In bushcricket mating systems where males provide females with a nuptial gift, relative energy expenditure in offspring influences the PRR of males and females and underlies a diet-mediated shift in the OSR. Here we investigated if there is a similar positive relationship between relative parental nutrient expenditure in offspring and PRR in the polyandrous butterfly Pieris napi, where female fecundity is strongly dependent on male nuptial gifts at mating. By varying the amount of nutrients females receive at mating and relating this to number of offspring produced, we show that male P. napi have, on average, a nutrient expenditure in offspring equaling that of females. In spite of this, the male reproductive rate is 813 times higher than that of females. Hence the relative degree of parental expenditure in offspring is largely decoupled from the degree of mating competition in P. napi. Two alternative explanations are advanced to account for the difference between the butterfly and the bushcricket mating systems.
Key words: butterflies, nuptial gifts, parental investment, Pieris napi, polyandry, reproductive rate, sexual selection.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Estrada, S. Yildizhan, S. Schulz, and L. E. Gilbert Sex-specific chemical cues from immatures facilitate the evolution of mate guarding in Heliconius butterflies Proc R Soc B, October 14, 2009; (2009) rspb.2009.1476v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Saastamoinen, S. Ikonen, and I. Hanski Significant effects of Pgi genotype and body reserves on lifespan in the Glanville fritillary butterfly Proc R Soc B, April 7, 2009; 276(1660): 1313 - 1322. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. W Simmons and C. Kvarnemo Costs of breeding and their effects on the direction of sexual selection Proc R Soc B, February 22, 2006; 273(1585): 465 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Wedell Female receptivity in butterflies and moths J. Exp. Biol., September 15, 2005; 208(18): 3433 - 3440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Wedell, C. Wiklund, and P. A. Cook Monandry and polyandry as alternative lifestyles in a butterfly Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2002; 13(4): 450 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Ahnesjo, C. Kvarnemo, and S. Merilaita Using potential reproductive rates to predict mating competition among individuals qualified to mate Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2001; 12(4): 397 - 401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Rooney and S. M. Lewis Differential allocation of male-derived nutrients in two lampyrid beetles with contrasting life-history characteristics Behav. Ecol., January 1, 1999; 10(1): 97 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


