Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shafir, S.
Right arrow Articles by Roughgarden, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shafir, S.
Right arrow Articles by Roughgarden, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Testing predictions of foraging theory for a sit-and-wait forager, Anolis gingivinus

Sharoni Shafira and Jonathan Roughgardena,b

aDepartment of Biological Sciences, Stanford University CA 94305, USA bDepartment of Geophysics, Stanford University CA 94305, USA

ABSTRACT

Research in foraging theory has been dominated by studies of active foragers choosing among patches and among prey within a patch. Studies of central-place foraging have mainly focused on loading decisions of an animal provisioning a central place. The problem faced by a sit-and-wait forager that encounters prey at a distance has received little attention. In this study we tested foraging theory predictions for such foragers, Anolis gingivinus females in the West Indies island of Anguilla. We presented lizards with antlion larvae at various distances. Experiment 1 showed that an individual's probability of pursuing prey decreases with the prey's distance and is best described by a sigmoidal function (which may be as steep as a step function). This function's inflection point defines a cutoff distance. Experiment 3 tested how cutoff distance changes as a function of prey size. Cutoff distances were greater for larger prey, as predicted for an energy-maximizing forager. Experiments 2 and 4 tested how cutoff distance changes as a function of prey abundance. As predicted, cutoff distance were greater at a site where prey abundance was lower. Furthermore, cutoff distances decreased immediately following prey augmentation and returned to previous values within one day of ending augmentation. Thus, moles' foraging behavior is a dynamic process, consistent with the qualitative predictions of foraging theory. We attribute the success of this study in supporting fundamental foraging theory predictions to the lizards exhibiting natural behavior under field conditions and to particular advantages of studying sit-and-wait foragers.

Key words: Anguilla, Anolis gingivinus, cutoff distance, encounter at a distance, foraging theory, lizards, partial preferences, prey abundance, prey size, sit-and-wait foragers, threshold, zero-one rule.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.