Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (43)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fiske, P.
Right arrow Articles by Karvonen, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fiske, P.
Right arrow Articles by Karvonen, E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Mating success in lekking males: a meta-analysis

Peder Fiske, Pekka T. Rintamäki and Eevi Karvonen

Department of Zoology, Uppsala University Villavägen 9, S-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden

ABSTRACT

Traits that are correlated with mating success are likely to be subject to sexual selection. In lekking species, a male's mating success can be estimated as the number of females that he copulates with. Earlier reviews of sexual selection in lekking species have been inconclusive, suggesting that different traits may be important in different species. To obtain a more complete understanding of the outcome of sexual selection in this mating system, we performed a meta-analysis in which we combined the results from different studies across a wide variety of taxa. Our aim was to synthesize available information about correlates of male mating success in lekking species. We found that behavioral traits such as male display activit aggression rate, and lek attendance were positively correlated with male mating success. Further, territory position was negatively correlated with male mating success, such that males with territories close to the geometric center of the leks had higher mating success than other males. The size of "extravagant" traits, such as birds tails and ungulate antlers, and age were positively correlated with male mating success. Male morphology (measure of body size) and territory size showed small effects on male mating success. Our results confirm some of the suggestions put forward by earlier reviews but add more rigor to the condusions drawn. Part of the variation across studies still remain unaccounted for. Further studies are needed to perform proper meta-analyses that can take factors like phylogeny and sexual dimorphism into account.

Key words: lekking, mating success, meta-analysis, sexual selection.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
L. J. Morrell and W. L. Romey
Optimal individual positions within animal groups
Behav. Ecol., July 1, 2008; 19(4): 909 - 919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
A. C. Stein and J. A. C. Uy
Plumage brightness predicts male mating success in the lekking golden-collared manakin, Manacus vitellinus
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 41 - 47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
I. M. Hamilton, M. P. Haesler, and M. Taborsky
Predators, reproductive parasites, and the persistence of poor males on leks
Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2006; 17(1): 97 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Bro-Jorgensen
From the Cover: Overt female mate competition and preference for central males in a lekking antelope
PNAS, July 9, 2002; 99(14): 9290 - 9293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 BMJHome page

Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and
BMJ, January 13, 2001; 322(7278): 98 - 101.
[Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Behav EcolHome page
P. T. Rintamaki, J. Hoglund, E. Karvonen, R. V. Alatalo, N. Bjorklund, A. Lundberg, O. Ratti, and J. Vouti
Combs and sexual selection in black grouse (Tetrao tetrix)
Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2000; 11(5): 465 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.