| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 1998 International Society for Behavioral Ecology
research-article |
The importance of being familiar: individual recognition and social behavior in sea trout (Salmo trutta)
aSection of Animal Ecology, Department of Zoology Box 463, S-413 90 Göteborg, Sweden bLaboratory of Stream Ecology, National Board of Fisheries S-810 70 Alvkarleby, Sweden cInstitute of Freshwater Research S-178 93 Drottningholm, Sweden, and Department of Zoology, Stockholm University S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
Adress correspondence to J. Höjesjö. E-mail: johan.hojesjo{at}zool.gu.se
ABSTRACT
This study addressed two hypotheses: (1) that individual recognition is used to reduce the cost of contesting resources in sea trout and (2) that the hatchery environment selects against individual recognition. Predictions from these hypotheses were tested in laboratory experiments where behavior and growth were studied in juvenile sea trout. In tact groups of familiar fish were compared with groups that contained both familiar and unfamiliar individuals. In general, the results were in agreement with the first hypothesis. Familiar fish in intact groups had more stable dominance ranks, higher food intake, and better utilization of food. Familiarity also reduced the distance to the nearest neighbor. Furthermore, initiators of conflicts were more likely to win against familiar fish than against strangers. These results support game-theory-based hypotheses explaining the dear-enemy phenomenon as an effect of familiarity A picture emerges in which familiarity stabilizes the hierarchical structure of a group and governs behavioral modifications that will promote feeding and growth, in turn leading to higher fitness. The second hypothesis, which predicted a reduced effect of individual recognition in sea-ranched trout, was not strongly supported because familiarity affected sea-ranched and wild trout similarly in most respects. However, familiarity was not beneficial for growth in sea-ranched trout, whereas it increased growth rate in wild fish. In addition, sea-ranched trout tended to maintain larger distances to their nearest neighbors than did wild trout.
Key words: brown trout, individual recognition, Salmo trutta, social behavior.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S. K. Darden, R. James, I. W. Ramnarine, and D. P. Croft Social implications of the battle of the sexes: sexual harassment disrupts female sociality and social recognition Proc R Soc B, July 22, 2009; 276(1667): 2651 - 2656. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. Hemsworth, W. Villareal, B. W. Patullo, and D. L. MacMillan Crustacean Social Behavioral Changes in Response to Isolation Biol. Bull., October 1, 2007; 213(2): 187 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. T. McDougall and D. L. Kramer Short-term behavioral consequences of territory relocation in a Caribbean damselfish, Stegastes diencaeus Behav. Ecol., January 1, 2007; 18(1): 53 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. M. Webster and P. J.B. Hart Kleptoparasitic prey competition in shoaling fish: effects of familiarity and prey distribution Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2006; 17(6): 959 - 964. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. E. Burns Behavioral ecology of disturbed landscapes: the response of territorial animals to relocation Behav. Ecol., September 1, 2005; 16(5): 898 - 905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Ridley, D. W. Yu, and W. J. Sutherland Why long-lived species are more likely to be social: the role of local dominance Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2005; 16(2): 358 - 363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. J. W. Ward, P. J. B. Hart, and J. Krause The effects of habitat- and diet-based cues on association preferences in three-spined sticklebacks Behav. Ecol., November 1, 2004; 15(6): 925 - 929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. F. Sundstrom, E. Petersson, J. Hojesjo, J. I. Johnsson, and T. Jarvi Hatchery selection promotes boldness in newly hatched brown trout (Salmo trutta): implications for dominance Behav. Ecol., March 1, 2004; 15(2): 192 - 198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|