Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bernasoni, G.
Right arrow Articles by Keller, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bernasoni, G.
Right arrow Articles by Keller, L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 1998 International Society for Behavioral Ecology

research-article

Phenotype and individual investment in cooperative foundress associations of the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta

Giorgina Bernasoni and Laurent Keller

Institute of Zoology, University of Berne Ethologische Station Hasli, CH-3032 Hinterkappelen, Switzerland, and Institute of Zoology and Animal Ecology, University of Lausanne Bâtiment de Biologic, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland

Address correspondence to G. Bernasconi, who is now at the Institute of Environmental Sciences, Univemty of Zurich, Winierthureratr. 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland. E-mail: bernasco{at}uwinst.unizh.ch

ABSTRACT

Fire ant (Solenopsis invida) queens founding a colony with unrelated nest mates potentially face a trade-off. Increased individual investment enhances worker production, colony survival, and growth. However, increased investment may reduce a queen's probability of surviving fights that invariably arise after worker eclosion. Indeed, previous studies showed that queens lose less weight (a measure of investment) when initiating colonies with cofoundresses than when alone, and that within associations the queen losing more weight is more likely to die. In this study, we tested whether queens adjust weight loss to social environment and fighting ability and whether restraining weight loss directly increases survival prospects. Experimental manipulation of colonies showed that reduced investment by queens within associations is primarily a response to the presence of a nest mate and not simply a response to per-queen brood-care demands. Differences in head width were associated with relative and combined weight loss of cofoundresses, as well as with queen survival. In contrast, the investment strategies of queens were not significantly influenced by their nest mates' initial weight. Similarly, manipulation of the queens' relative weight by feeding and exposure to contrasting social environment (queens kept alone or in groups) did not significantly affect survivaL These results indicate that head width differences or correlated phenotypic atthbutes of fighting ability influenced both investment strategies and survival probability of queens. That queens with larger heads invested less energy into brood rearing and were more likely to survive reveals more selfish interactions among cofoundresses than has previously been assumed and casts some doubts about the idea that group selection must be invoked to account for the maintenance of cooperation in foundress associations of ants.

Key words: ants, body size, conflict, cooperation, Solesnopsis invicta.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Behav EcolHome page
R. Jeanson and J. H. Fewell
Influence of the social context on division of labor in ant foundress associations
Behav. Ecol., February 25, 2008; (2008) arn018v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.